Really? Hallam Hope or Samuel Eto'o?
If that's true, it's a remarkable deal.
Really?! I mean really?Yeah!
Sod the younger players. Let's bring in a "name" for lots of money!
You go girlfriend!
Very possibly, I meant backup at the club rather than on the pitch i.e not in direct competition with Rom, I wasn't clear there sorry. But I like the options this gives us. With Naismith in good form we may have Eto'o on the bench or vice versa with options to swap out Rom or the second forward. Either way we'll go from very limited options currently (which showed on Saturday) to the ability to react or shake up a game with 3 forwards who are all capable slotters.Don't think he'll play backup - I think he'll play as first choice in the Naismith role behind Lukaku, or when Lukaku moves out wide.
Really?! I mean really?
We're talking about the same person here right? Hope or E'too? Bet that keeps Martinez awake at night...
I could see a 4-3-3 until Barkley returns....Don't think he'll play backup - I think he'll play as first choice in the Naismith role behind Lukaku, or when Lukaku moves out wide.
With all due respect, Moyes didn't even have the funds to bid for that dud. How quickly we forget...Samuel Eto'o joining FC Everton. Just pmsl at that. Remarkable. Moyes would have preferred to go after Dickov than Eto'o in his tenure.
My point was never that Hope was better than Eto'o
My point was that rather than bringing in an older player for big money as a short term fix, maybe it would be better to cultivate our younger players with a long term view
That being said, it sounds like we've got Eto'o at a very reasonable wage considering his "name value", so it's not as urgent a reason to be wary of the deal as I first thought
With all due respect, Moyes didn't even have the funds to bid for that dud. How quickly we forget...