Frank Lampard

Status
Not open for further replies.

08252010Musketeers.jpg
 
He's boss and got much bigger clubs with CL football and title pushes each year looking at it... if we get him it'd be mad.

Rather have Leroy and his exploding knees though, or Wanyama.
 

Great at clubs where's he's allowed a free role to do **** all other than shoot at goal, carried by the other players. Would be extra bad here, Neville and Osman don't even do enough to justify their own selection.
 
Chang Elephant said:
Great at clubs where's he's allowed a free role to do **** all other than shoot at goal, carried by the other players. Would be extra bad here, Neville and Osman don't even do enough to justify their own selection.
Click to expand...

hahahaha, yeah Ok lad.

Lampard would be a fantastic signing, but we'll be way down the list that he'll end up having to choose from.
 

The only way we would get is if we offer him a longer contract than the CL clubs are prepared to offer.

IMO has proved that he still has what is required of a PL player this season. Also not troubled by too many major injuries.
 
Chang Elephant said:
Great at clubs where's he's allowed a free role to do **** all other than shoot at goal, carried by the other players. Would be extra bad here, Neville and Osman don't even do enough to justify their own selection.
Click to expand...

I think it is Frank Lampard we are linked with mate. Not sure who you are talking about. He was the difference between us and Chelsea at Goodison, and probably not just this season either.
 
No resale value, not enough left in the legs, comparably massive contract and we'd have to build a side around him for him to be any use at all.

I sort of see what Chang Elephant means because he offers very little other than his poachers instinct. In quite a few games you can go 90 minutes and not realise he was playing. There's wouldn't be that much difference between bringing Lampard in and bringing Cahill back for that reason (except obviously Lampard is the better player).

I wouldn't like to see us go for him as it would be a "headline" signing that would disguise any proper signings we could make instead - or disguise big sales. Another Gazza or Ginola, albeit a higher quality one.
 
Even though he's 34, I would fap myself silly if we signed him, does not rely on pace, he could play on for another 2-3 years at a high level, would be a great acquisition if we finished in the Champions league especially.
 
Tubey said:
No resale value, not enough left in the legs, comparably massive contract and we'd have to build a side around him for him to be any use at all.

I sort of see what Chang Elephant means because he offers very little other than his poachers instinct. In quite a few games you can go 90 minutes and not realise he was playing. There's wouldn't be that much difference between bringing Lampard in and bringing Cahill back for that reason (except obviously Lampard is the better player).

I wouldn't like to see us go for him as it would be a "headline" signing that would disguise any proper signings we could make instead - or disguise big sales. Another Gazza or Ginola, albeit a higher quality one.
Click to expand...

Yeah but how boss was Ginola for 20 minutes vs Arsenal in the rain? Very boss.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top