davids
Player Valuation: £70m
Didn't we offer him a contract but he said no?TBH I would have kept Young as a back up left back if we don't buy someone.
Didn't we offer him a contract but he said no?TBH I would have kept Young as a back up left back if we don't buy someone.
If O’Brien is our starting RB going into next season, this window has been an unmitigated disaster
I’d personally start O’Brien to start to solidify that partnership at the back with Branthwaite but understand that Moyes will err on the side of experience with Tarks. Which is fine given how good Tarkowski has been, he’s a rock. I’m not saying it’s an easy decision to make. Having Tarkowski on the bench sometimes could help his legs long term but that’s not guaranteed.So you think OBrien should be on the bench or starting next to Branners instead of Tarkowski?
Personally i think we should prioritise a number 6 no one in our squad can play that position properly.
I mean if we had a blank check id want the whole midfield replaced as tim and Armstrong both probably need another loan spell and garner and gana both arent good enough for me.
But we have to stretch the money we have and imo we have to get 2 rw, striker(maybe 2), RB/LB.
I just cant see us getting 2 cms in
May we have hard selection decisions all over the parkI’d personally start O’Brien to start to solidify that partnership at the back with Branthwaite but understand that Moyes will err on the side of experience with Tarks. Which is fine given how good Tarkowski has been, he’s a rock. I’m not saying it’s an easy decision to make. Heaving Tarkowski on the bench sometimes could help his legs long term but that’s not guaranteed.
But again, O’Brien is a center back, not a right back. He was bought as a center back to play center back. He did a great job solving an issue last season but is the chance to actually solve it with a proper right back.
O’Brien was often very reluctant to cross the ball when he got up the field (which is understandable, given that he’s yes, a center back). I’d rather have a selection issue between Tarkowski/O’Brien than a square peg at right back for another season.
Did I mention that O’Brien is a center back?
Agree with what saying mine is more about the options for rb patterson/coleman. A rb should 100% be coming in this window, i would understand obrien starting in that position at the start if the season. Then say was the rb at coventry Milan van Ewijk who would hopefully break into the team during the season. Is good to have different options and formations so we can adapt differeny stylesI’d personally start O’Brien to start to solidify that partnership at the back with Branthwaite but understand that Moyes will err on the side of experience with Tarks. Which is fine given how good Tarkowski has been, he’s a rock. I’m not saying it’s an easy decision to make. Heaving Tarkowski on the bench sometimes could help his legs long term but that’s not guaranteed.
But again, O’Brien is a center back, not a right back. He was bought as a center back to play center back. He did a great job solving an issue last season but is the chance to actually solve it with a proper right back.
O’Brien was often very reluctant to cross the ball when he got up the field (which is understandable, given that he’s yes, a center back). I’d rather have a selection issue between Tarkowski/O’Brien than a square peg at right back for another season.
Did I mention that O’Brien is a center back?
Do we need 1 or 2 CMs? Thought it was nailed on we needed two![]()
Think we need 1 starter cm.
Then we have gana, garner, tim, alcaraz and armstrong to come back as well. So that would be 6 cms
Maybe, but the attacking part of the role is non-existent once he crosses the half way line - which I’m not judging him for at all as it’s not part of his natural game.Agree with what saying mine is more about the options for rb patterson/coleman. A rb should 100% be coming in this window, i would understand obrien starting in that position at the start if the season. Then say was the rb at coventry Milan van Ewijk who would hopefully break into the team during the season. Is good to have different options and formations so we can adapt differeny styles
Personally i think we should prioritise a number 6 no one in our squad can play that position properly.
I mean if we had a blank check id want the whole midfield replaced as tim and Armstrong both probably need another loan spell and garner and gana both arent good enough for me.
But we have to stretch the money we have and imo we have to get 2 rw, striker(maybe 2), RB/LB.
I just cant see us getting 2 cms in
I’d personally start O’Brien to start to solidify that partnership at the back with Branthwaite but understand that Moyes will err on the side of experience with Tarks. Which is fine given how good Tarkowski has been, he’s a rock. I’m not saying it’s an easy decision to make. Having Tarkowski on the bench sometimes could help his legs long term but that’s not guaranteed.
But again, O’Brien is a center back, not a right back. He was bought as a center back to play center back. He did a great job solving an issue last season but is the chance to actually solve it with a proper right back.
O’Brien was often very reluctant to cross the ball when he got up the field (which is understandable, given that he’s yes, a center back). I’d rather have a selection issue between Tarkowski/O’Brien than a square peg at right back for another season.
Did I mention that O’Brien is a center back?
Agree with what saying mine is more about the options for rb patterson/coleman. A rb should 100% be coming in this window, i would understand obrien starting in that position at the start if the season. Then say was the rb at coventry Milan van Ewijk who would hopefully break into the team during the season. Is good to have different options and formations so we can adapt differeny styles
Has a lot of potential, but I don't think he's worth 40m, wouldn't spend more than 25m on him personally.
Too much of a risk.
40m Euros though. What's that in English pounds and pence?