6 + 2 Point Deductions

[Tel001]

Tottenham's losses over the last three years are beyond that threshold at £220.7m, but the annual depreciation charge of £72m, which refers to their stadium and other facilities, means they are not at risk of breaching PSR regulations.

So basically , they’re ran by an actual business man that knows what he’s doing ?

 

[NathDogg]

OH OF COURSE THEY ARE

Just laughable isn’t it, not even trying to hide their contempt for Everton and evertonians.

Just in time to let the billionaires city and Chelsea just have to pay a fine for their transgressions, who’d have thunk it.

Watch them try and take more points off us at the end of this week just to rub chilli into the wounds.

Beyond a farce this entire corrupt sham.

We seriously need to get Masters and these PL swines to CaS and even the high court - take them for everything that they have taken from us.

 

[DuncansPigeons]

Everton will be all over this. They may be changing the rules going forward but City, Chelsea, Leicester all committed alledged breaches under the old rules and all cases need to be heard under that basis

 

[NathDogg]

Everton will be all over this. They may be changing the rules going forward but City, Chelsea, Leicester all committed alledged breaches under the old rules and all cases need to be heard under that basis

We won’t mate, we’re clueless, rudderless and leaderless.

 

[Lloydaldo11]

OH OF COURSE THEY ARE

The phrase about breweries springs to mind.

“Best league in the world” and they haven’t got a clue.

Let’s not forget that the £105m rule doesn’t take into account basic economics with the fact inflation has been all over the place in the last 18 months.

Utter jokers and we will be the fall guys as usual with the happy clapping clowns currently in charge

 

[Curtis]

City is going to find a way to evade charges aren't they? lol

 

[Exeter_Gently]

We won’t mate, we’re clueless, rudderless and leaderless

Correct...we won't do jack and we'll take another points deduction next week.

If Chong has got anything about him he'll be straight into the PL headquarters throwing absolute mazzy windmills,and if he isn't he should be.

 

[NathDogg]

Be suing us again for a couple of quid. Thought they were a well ran club…..

 

[Exeter_Gently]

For all the so called billions sloshing about the game there seems to be a lot of teams flying by the seat of their pants.

 

[Moomin]

I do love this thread as i find myself swaying like the wind with Everton fans opinions on dyche.
I dont really want dyche. So without a few nobheads who just want an argument(Zzzzz) who are realistic decent replacements. Without the "there are plenty of managers out there" replies. most championship and league 1 managers would take the job. Doesnt mean they would be good at it. Who looks promising. Either here or foreign coaches. As i dont have any names.

We are high risk for any manager at the moment.

Would be someone desperate for work or tempted by high wages we offer.

Dyche is a short term solution but until we have new owners I wouldn't look to change. Hopefully that is this summer.

 

[Goat]

On any charge after the Premier League's 4 year investigation?

If not, then what does this say about the Premier League?

It says that the Premier League are run by morons and City tied them in knots.

I think other than Mancini turning whistleblower, they will walk away pretty scott free, 1 way or the other.

 

[peteblue]

City is going to find a way to evade charges aren't they? lol

Of course…this whole thing is a complete farce…..

 

[Gilbert..]

We are high risk for any manager at the moment.

Would be someone desperate for work or tempted by high wages we offer.

Dyche is a short term solution but until we have new owners I wouldn't look to change. Hopefully that is this summer.

I put that in the wrong thread. Meant to be in the dyche one. But agree. Nobody with high stock would take the Everton job. It would have to be a gamble on anyone showing promise at a lower level.

 

[pfim]

It’s not a comparison with us that’s the issue. They’re a far better ran outfit than ourselves, and like I said they’ll more than likely be fine.

But, what does it like for the league when such a well run club are still recording loses over the three-year allowance? Add Chelsea and Newcastle.

The rules will be changed to ensure that the PL retains its advantage, certain clubs can compete and the gravy train for executives is sustained.

They're "losing" money because they built a stadium and are depreciating it at an accelerated rate.

Guys, there's nothing to see here on Spurs. They're well run and cash positive, PSR compliant.

There's nothing to pick apart. They're doing well.

 

[kiss the crest]

So instead of the Premier League trying to level the playing field up, they bring in a rule to benefit the cartel 6 and the players for more wages.

Don't they see that is exactly the problem