No he didn't.Moshiri admitted that we broke PSR so that we could replace a non-existent midfield.
It is harder to think of a clearer on-field example.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No he didn't.Moshiri admitted that we broke PSR so that we could replace a non-existent midfield.
It is harder to think of a clearer on-field example.
One of the major points of PSR is to stop badly run clubs from entering administration and gaining a sporting advantage by dumping debt and starting again.Do you think we should have a 10 point deduction for breaching PSR when the PL rules that 9 points is sufficient for a sanction for the worse situation of entering administration?
One of the major points of PSR is to stop badly run clubs from entering administration and gaining a sporting advantage by dumping debt and starting again.
Argument doesn't make much sense to me tbh.But the argument wil be that we had player on the pitch we wouldn’t have had if we’d met PSR
Its so amateurish, the man’s supposed to be a billionaire accountant, he couldnt even operate a ruddy spreadsheet it seems
I understand what PSR is supposed to do but you have not answered my question.One of the major points of PSR is to stop badly run clubs from entering administration and gaining a sporting advantage by dumping debt and starting again.
Everton’s understandable desire to improve its on-pitch performance (to replace theNo he didn't.
Is Everton’s culpability and punishment worse than that of a club that goes into administration?Everton’s understandable desire to improve its on-pitch performance (to replace the
non-existent midfield, as Mr Moshiri put it in evidence) led it to take chances
with its PSR position: those chances resulted in it exceeding the £105 million
threshold by £19.5 million.
The position that Everton finds itself in is of its own making – it is Everton’s
responsibility to ensure that it complies with the PSR regime. The excess
over the threshold is significant. The consequence is that Everton’s
culpability is great.
Everton’s understandable desire to improve its on-pitch performance (to replace the
non-existent midfield, as Mr Moshiri put it in evidence) led it to take chances
with its PSR position: those chances resulted in it exceeding the £105 million
threshold by £19.5 million.
The position that Everton finds itself in is of its own making – it is Everton’s
responsibility to ensure that it complies with the PSR regime. The excess
over the threshold is significant. The consequence is that Everton’s
culpability is great.
Seems to me that a lot of people think that losing £105 million every three years is an acceptable way to run a football club. Try doing that lower down the leagues and see where you get. It astonishes me that this threshold is seen as entirely normal and acceptable. Coming from a business environment, I'm puzzled by this as it seems ridiculous that you can continually be sanctioned to lose this amount of money.So, effectively breaching PSR on a much bigger scale then, yes?
It is at Premier League level where you only lose 9 pts. It is the same punishment you'd receive at Championship level or lower. I'd say, in general, that Premier League teams should be held to a higher standard. However, that standard needs to be set before play commences and not come along in an arbitrary way like this appears to have done in our case.Is Everton’s culpability and punishment worse than that of a club that goes into administration?
Seems to me that a lot of people think that losing £105 million every three years is an acceptable way to run a football club. Try doing that lower down the leagues and see where you get. It astonishes me that this threshold is seen as entirely normal and acceptable. Coming from a business environment, I'm puzzled by this as it seems ridiculous that you can continually be sanctioned to lose this amount of money.
And this could tailspin into another VAR argument....Fairness in football is based on results on a football field. You should get whatever the league table says you deserve after 38 games.
No, being punished for continually taking financial gambles.so being punished for struggling basically?
The IC's verdict was that Everton had acted recklessly by continuing to sign players even though we knew we had huge PSR issues. The IC's verdict was that we had misled the Premier League over Stadium funding.I understand what PSR is supposed to do but you have not answered my question.
The PL rule book states clubs that go into administration will be deducted 9 points.
The PL rule book does not have any sanctions for clubs that breach PSR but are not in administration.
Do you think Everton should have a bigger points deduction than that given for clubs that go into administration?