6 + 2 Point Deductions

[Goat]

No, they didnt. They have said the money that the Premier League is saying was spent was indeed spent but that it shouldn't be counted against as it was due to financing the stadium build, no? Which, iirc, was able to be written off when the rules were originally made up?

I dont wish to sound condescending, but I really advise you to read the entire commission report, its very lengthy, but I think the majority of peoples opinion would change once they read it all.

But see the edit I made above.

 

[NathDogg]

They never left, mate. I'm beginning to have my doubts about a couple who always seem to like gwladysnight's posts.

I must have unblocked them, thought they had took the hint.

Defo a few more lurkers about.

 

[pfim]

No, they didnt. They have said the money that the Premier League is saying was spent was indeed spent but that it shouldn't be counted against as it was due to financing the stadium build, no? Which, iirc, was able to be written off when the rules were originally made up?

The club admitted to breaching the PSR threshold by 7.9 million. It's right there in the document.

 

[RD2910]

I dont wish to sound condescending, but I really advise you to read the entire commission report, its very lengthy, but I think the majority of peoples opinion would change once they read it all.

But see the edit I made above.

Only 41 pages...

 

[Goat]

Only 41 pages...

41 pages is like reading a Bible to the Tik Tok generation.

 

[chicoazul]

Hello pal, hope you’re well. On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate your judgement on the game of football?

@gwladysnight buddy there’s no reason to fear me, I am famed for my friendliness and conflict resolution. Hello.

 

[gwladysnight]

No, they didnt. They have said the money that the Premier League is saying was spent was indeed spent but that it shouldn't be counted against as it was due to financing the stadium build, no? Which, iirc, was able to be written off when the rules were originally made up?

No that isn't correct.

We admitted the breach but argued over the amount we had breached it by.

It is here in black and white.

In its Amended Answer Everton admitted it
had abandoned its claim to be entitled to many of the additional exclusions
that it had advanced in its PSR calculation, and accepted that it had exceeded
the PSR threshold. Maintaining its entitlement to exclude the Transfer Levy
and the pre-planning stadium interest adjustment, Everton argued that its
breach of the PSR threshold was £7.9 million.

 

[NathDogg]

What a response from Citizens of Suburbia

Tweet of the year that mate.

 

[Yarrgh]

The PL would have had no chance considering 90% of this very forum, who you would consider reasonably knowledgeable blues, were up Moshiri's hoop until as recently as last year.

Those of us who warned what he was were tarred with being idiots, RS or Bill Kenwright luvvies.

The majority on here were more bothered about boasting how rich we were rather than thinking about it for a minute.

This line of thought does seems to be a common theme with some other fellow returning blues.

 

[ToffeeTim]

Sorry if already posted and I know Carra is a trumpet, but hes not wrong here.

I go back to the same thing I've said many times....

There are two different issues at play here.

Yes he is right that the leadership of the club has been abysmal. And I have no problem with anyone saying that. He has said it multiple times in the past and that's fine.

But the treatment from the PL has also been completely ridiculous and to be handed the biggest points deduction in the history of top flight english football, is a complete joke and can't be justified.

Just because our owner has done an absolutely terrible job doesn't make it appropriate to be given the penalty of 10 points, and now another charge before even getting to have our appeal on the first one. The process is a complete nonsense.

 

[MIKE85]

Someone with Audit firm knowledge, is it normal for a company of our size to change auditors 3 times in a timespan of 4 years?

 

[ToffeeTim]

I dont wish to sound condescending, but I really advise you to read the entire commission report, its very lengthy, but I think the majority of peoples opinion would change once they read it all.

But see the edit I made above.

In fairness, I did and I don't agree with how the mitigating factors were dismissed.

 

[Goat]

Someone with Audit firm knowledge, is it normal for a company of our size to change auditors 3 times in 4 years?

Should I change auditors regularly? | JCS Accountants

Some people think it's best to change auditors on a regular basis to reduce independence risk and get fresh ideas. We don’t think that’s always the case.

www.jcssutton.co.uk

 

[RomanReigns]

Someone with Audit firm knowledge, is it normal for a company of our size to change auditors 3 times in 4 years?

yeah its pretty standard, its like car insurance

 

[Ivo]

I've got gwladysnight on ignore. Called him and Howardsway out when we got hit with the initial ten points. They both stuck out like a sore thumb. And here's gwladysnight again, as if by magic when we get another charge.

I actually have a hunch who gwladysnight is, but it's only a hunch so I'll keep it in my head for now.