The bigger picture?
Does it involve paying 80 million pound for a player whos never broke 10 goals in 9 seasons?
Cos if so, im glad im blind.
Forget the cash. Its monopoly money.
As a player I'd say he's "best of the rest" - take away the sky sports teams and he's the one who can make a difference for us. Similar to Vardy 3 seasons ago.
Think of it another way - when we go down to palace first game of season he's the single player on that team you know you want to read has an injury and cant play.
For the way we play he's perfect. I've already compared him to Kanchelskis in this thread before Mr D did. And I stand by that.