“Outdated and draconian” is an appropriate description for a 70s referee like Clive Thomas, but is a particularly jarring way of describing, say, the horrific murder of Jamal Khashoggi. I’m fairly sure that most people on here have more of their identity tied up with Everton than “PDFs”, so it would be very odd if they didn’t have a different level of disgust and were reluctant to instantly sell their souls to an unnamed Saudi Prince, no questions asked.
That's kinda the point I'm making.
Where do you draw the line?
Not only what happened to people like Jamal (and others), or the persecution of LGBTQ+, the ongoing war with Houthis in Yemen
How strong a feeling do you have before you protest things linked to Saudi Arabia?
As you say, People are 'more invested in Everton than PDFs ' so they'll probably give up Adobe before Everton, where is YOUR line?
Eg, not all Newcastle fans are Tea Towel wearing accolytes. There's a sizeable group who protest at every game, it doesn't stop them supporting the team.
My point was (again) the performative hand wringing from probably 30/40% of people is exactly that. Performative, based on twitter sized attention spans.
Cheers.