Utility players

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that players don't want to play the role of the utility man.

When you play in a number of positions you don't get to be really good in any of them. And manageres never think of you as the one for a particular spot. So you'll end up being benched and thought to fill any hole that opens up.
 

Alan Harper was a really good utility player back in the 1980s glory days. Didn't score many but the were always important. Recall him playing sweeper for Man City in Howard Kendall first game managing them. Was actually against Everton. Shows how good that Everton team was that a fine player like Kevin Richardson was allowed leave. Recall him playing for Aston Villa when the were in with a great chance of winning a title. Could have had the opportunity of winning three titles with three different clubs. Think United piped Villa to the title.
 

Geoff Nulty, he could play in a variety of positions.

The problem being, he was never better than 'really average' in all of them.
 
Most only seem to have one or two positions and they tend be roughly the same position anyway, like Barkley with his ability play in different positions... as long as its central midfield.

Biggest contrast for a while is probably Fellaini as defensive mid, second and main striker roles.
 
Alan Harper was my favourite. I think they are less necessary due to the number of subs. When you could only name 1 sub, they had to be able to play in a number of positions. These days,with 7 subs, it's not so vital.

Probably the match management is more technical now as well? Smaller tweaks in formation and strategy, along with more subs and a deeper bench allow both for direct substitutions and for more demanding roles?
 


Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top