Confirmed Signing Tyler Dibling

[9LeagueTitles5FACups]

High Risk, High Reward when we sell him for £100m in 2 years time.

...or lose him on the cheap if he comes here and fails to shine. In our position it would certainly be a high risk transfer for a 19-year-old. I am not averse to purchasing young players but they have to be at the right price.

 

[14_dollars]

This low ball scatter gun transfer strategy is making the club a laughing stock.

 

[MACCA75]

Mad that Chelsea have already signed this lad previously.

 

[pfim]

They won’t sell for less than £50m so please don’t bother wasting any more time on this stupid vanity pursuit.

They’re not getting 50m for him. He’s still all potential. There’ll be a sell on clause if he’s sold.

 

[MikeH72]

One wonders why we weren’t bidding for this clear long term target much earlier than July 31st so we had time to realise that we couldn’t afford their ludicrous asking price and then move on.

 

[maccavennie]

If he only lasted 6 weeks when Chelsea signed him and he wanted to go back to Southampton, wait until the North Stand Da's get a hold of him. He'll have chucked in a transfer request after 6 days and be known as the South Coast David Unsworth!

 

[MikeH72]

They’re not getting 50m for him. He’s still all potential. There’ll be a sell on clause if he’s sold.

Someone will pay it, probably Chelsea.

 

[Eggs]

Never heard the lad's name...

Relative of Andy Dibble?

….more like;

 

[PITA]

Why?
Have you ever even smiled?

Apparently he smirked some time late December 2024.

 

[pfim]

Someone will pay it, probably Chelsea.

Then let them.

 

[Drico]

This low ball scatter gun transfer strategy is making the club a laughing stock.

"Alan Shearer has been sold to Newcastle for 15m, you say? We'd like to bid 13m, please."

 

[MikeH72]

Then let them.

Sound, that doesn’t help us.

The time for pissing about with low ball bids has been and gone 1 month ago. These chumps in charge of our recruitment need to get serious.

 

[mikel_88]

They won’t sell for less than £50m so please don’t bother wasting any more time on this stupid vanity pursuit.

Not sure was somebody on x (i kno could be bs) said in last 2 years not signing new deal and on ther forum said could see a bid between 30/365 mill get him

 

[barneygumble]

...or lose him on the cheap if he comes here and fails to shine. In our position it would certainly be a high risk transfer for a 19-year-old. I am not averse to purchasing young players but they have to be at the right price.

Old regime is over.

Positives only.

The lad is a boss player. Depends if the hybrid Park End/Gladys Street end eats him alive if he makes a bad pass against Brighton.

 

[MrGrumpy]

They won’t sell for less than £50m so please don’t bother wasting any more time on this stupid vanity pursuit.

Serious question but can you name 5 players we can actually buy who are better then we got because all you ever say is no not getting him