Today's football.

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

WOAH

Slow down there nelly

Don't tempt fate just yet

And now it's 2-1

Cheers @Allezfan , you've doomed us all

I hope you're happy

 

[bluelife]

FFS more mistakes than New Year's Eve happening here

 

[FTY]

100% getting 5th now.

Sake, midtable obscurity for us. Martinez out.

 

[ianefc]

100% getting 5th now.

We're in Europe next year.

Well done jynxers

 

[ianefc]

FFS more mistakes than New Year's Eve happening here

Is that a movie reference ?

 

[toffeejack]

saints' defence is why they are mid-table

 

[bluemangroup]

I'm sure he is to spurs fans what Ossie is to some of us

I think he's more what Hibbert was to us without the cult honey badger status.

 

[Ring master]

that mistake will I bet change this game completely,its been pretty much all saints in this match

 

[toffee matt]

Sherwood looks like he's on route to a wedding with that waistcoat on

 

[Seamus Colemole]

2-0, they're ripping them a new one. think that should have been offside, the player is standing in an offside position and puts off naughton as his concentration goes - that's surely interfering like?

I agree with you, his presence in an offside position gained his team the advantage they went on to score from so it shouldn't have stood.

But, i don't think the rules for intefering cover a player not attempting to play the ball when there is a possibitly other players in an onside position could get it, regardless of whether he distracts an opposition player (except for the keeper)

 

[toffeejack]

is it me or does vertonghan always lide tackle with the wrong foot?

 

[toffee matt]

It's so quiet at the lane

 

[Ring master]

could have been 3-1 there,good save

 

[ianefc]

Sherwood is the type if guy who sits down to take a leak

 

[toffeejack]

I agree with you, his presence in an offside position gained his team the advantage they went on to score from so it shouldn't have stood.

But, i don't think the rules for intefering cover a player not attempting to play the ball when there is a possibitly other players in an onside position could get it, regardless of whether he distracts an opposition player (except for the keeper)

there isn't a rule - that's why i think this offside rule is [Poor language removed]. i seem to be making the same point every weekend, because every weekend it happens. seriously don't undertsand what was wrong with the the original offside rule of being in an offside position when the ball was kicked forward, is offside. it was simple to understand and it was a rule.

now it's another bloody interpretation.