Today’s Football - 2024/25 Season

[allen]

I thought the keeper did manage to successfully reset himself. Even had time to take a couple of get ready bounces after shoving Silva out of the way.

He also stayed lying flat out on the ground when it went in. If he thought he wasn’t ready, or that Silva was offside, he’d have been straight up and fuming. But he knew he was beaten.

So goal for me.

Having said that, I’m sure I’d be raging if Everton were in Wolves’ position.

 

[MrGrumpy]

So you think it's a foul on the goalie?

If it was us it would be a foul

 

[matty1878]

Kopites imploding all over the shop.

no i would say people do on here more

see wolves 1-city 1 Posts

 

[Lee Smith]

My opinion not a goal, he stops the keeper coming out for it, but the wolves are bottom so who cares lol

No.

Silva just stood his ground. It’s not his job to move out of the keeper’s way! Silva wasn’t “offside” until Stones had headed it (as you can’t be offside direct from a corner), by which point he was nowhere near the keeper. If Wolves were so bothered about their keeper being protected, they should have had an outfield player making sure Silva couldn’t get near him.

100% goal every day of the week.

EDIT: basically what @johnjoeefc just said before me

 

[matty1878]

If it was us it would be a foul

but it wasn’t us as much as we say the sayin

 

[davek]

no i would say people do on here more

see wolves 1-city 1 Posts

No matter. It all ended well.

 

[MrGrumpy]

Jamie so unbiased there,

Allison best keeper in the world and the other fella best 2nd keeper in the world

 

[Brigadier2]

He’s not offside when the corner is taken so he can stand in the keeper’s way if he likes

He only becomes offside once Stones heads it and at that point he’s on his knees getting out of the way

Which is what everyone saw, how var has got involved is baffling.

 

[Mozza1987]

Why are people moaning saying that shouldn't have counted. 100% a goal

 

[Lee Smith]

Which is what everyone saw, how var has got involved is baffling.

VAR got involved because the lino had actually flagged for offside, and the on-field call was going to be offside (according to Sky). No one, including me, was aware of that it seems.

 

[Victus]

Why are people moaning saying that shouldn't have counted. 100% a goal

because its city

 

[tsubaki]

They just said the lino flagged for offside, so the VAR actually sent him to screen to overturn the offside call? Which puts a different perspective on things!

I think he’d given it anyway, irrespective of the flag.

Like yesterday’s Saliba decision it does make you wonder if they are actually asking the refs why they’ve made decisions before intervening.

 

[Lee Smith]

I think he’d given it anyway, irrespective of the flag.

Like yesterday’s Saliba decision it does make you wonder if they are actually asking the refs why they’ve made decisions before intervening.

Yeah I assumed he’d given it, and didn’t see the flag go up myself. Be interesting to see if there’s any footage of that.

Maybe the ref didn’t have a clue and just asked VAR what he should do

 

[Brigadier2]

VAR got involved because the lino had actually flagged for offside, and the on-field call was going to be offside (according to Sky). No one, including me, was aware of that it seems.

Wow that's even worse.

 

[jazzy]

There are 2 questions on the goal

1. Did Bernardo foul the keeper ? No
2. Was Bernardo offside when Stones headed it ? No , he went to the keepers , right on his knees giving the keeper a clear view.