I think we both know that’s a oversimplification of the situation, but if it stops them from experiencing this level of abuse then yes, that is definitely the lesser of two evils.So, in future KC (usually an excellent pundit) and other female pundits could, on rare occasion, say something equally ridiculous (not because they are women, but because they are mistaken, ill informed or any number of things a male pundit could equally be) and no response (from the offended party) would be appropriate because they are women?