Today’s Football 2019/20 Season

[Chris O'Connor]

Fulham have got a dilemma now.

Plan A - spend big and forget those who got them there? - that failed spectacularly last time

Plan B - give these a chance and surely get relegated as they're sh*t?

Either way result = relegation.

 

[Blue Shoes]

Brentford bottled it tonight, just like when West Brom had a late season wobble and they, out of the blue, had automatic promotion in their hands. They barely created anything.

Hopefully we'll play Fulham before fans are let back in stadiums. I really can't stand their tedious chant of 'come on Fulham come on Fulham'.

You do realise they'll just play that song on continuous loop on the speakers if there are no fans right? Ha

 

[PaulPowersTash]

Sanchez on £560k a week at United haha haha hahaha, it’s so ridiculous that he ain’t even that good and doesn’t always start for the club he’s on loan at

And united have to pay him a substantial sum of money to move on as well which is not being reported.
Probably the worst transfer in PL history or very close to it.

 

[YoboCopter]

And united have to pay him a substantial sum of money to move on as well which is not being reported.
Probably the worst transfer in PL history or very close to it.

Balosie?

 

[Alanbileysfeathercut]

View attachment 96736
A worst weapon?

 

[artetas_biggest_fan]

Yes, another club more relevant than Leeds

Leeds are a massive club mate.

They are one of those clubs that are instantly identifiable (the songs, the all white kit, the history), are a one club city, have a huge catchment area of Yorkshire to themselves...and just the name Leeds itself. Their potential is genuinely big. Competent owners, build a stadium to meet the demand (60k plus), and they are back among the very top sides.

I dare say, they’ve haven’t been in the Premier league for 16 years, but they have made a bigger imprint on it than us. A whole combination of things but they are a very newsworthy club.

West Brom and Fulham.


Zzzzzzzz

Wanted Brentford for that reason....ideally the three would have been Leeds, Brentford and Notts Forest (before Forest imploded on the final day).

 

[Connor]

I dare say, they’ve haven’t been in the Premier league for 16 years, but they have made a bigger imprint on it than us. A

Nope

 

[artetas_biggest_fan]

Nope

Watch Premier League years, they featured prominently on that.

The ‘dirty Leeds’ label (despite being from the 70s) is still there. Being the big side in Yorkshire also aids them in terms of identity. Despite not being in the top league for 16 years, they stayed relevant throughout. The rivalry with Man United is right up there too.

 

[jaycee]

View attachment 96736

Should have stuck with the lids

 

[Connor]

Despite not being in the top league for 16 years, they stayed relevant throughout.

Nope

 

[Tin-Tin]

Awful look from Arsenal this, no matter how they try to spin it. Bet those 55 staff are on average wages too

 

[Nymzee]

Awful look from Arsenal this, no matter how they try to spin it. Bet those 55 staff are on average wages too

Soon as they make a transfer signing they will get HAMMERED

 

[Tin-Tin]

Soon as they make a transfer signing they will get HAMMERED

Think Willian is pretty much agreed.

Think there should be transfer bans on clubs who do this. Disgusting

 

[H.H.]

Think Willian is pretty much agreed.

Think there should be transfer bans on clubs who do this. Disgusting

Can't believe I'm sticking up for them but as its the same for every club here goes*.

The buisness is the playing staff.
Example.
A printing buisness has to lay off staff because they have less work but technology has moved on and to keep up they have to buy new equipment.
If the work comes back, they re-employ the staff that are not currently needed.

Probably laid off because of covid and as they don't have 50,000 supporters turning up 30 times a year to need the staff.

 

[Nymzee]

Can't believe I'm sticking up for them but as its the same for every club here goes.

The buisness is the playing staff.
Example.
A printing buisness has to lay off staff because they have less work but technology has moved on and to keep up they have to buy new equipment.
If the work comes back, they re-employ the staff that are not currently needed.

I mean, that analogy is just bogus isn't it.