Time for a rethink... and a role for Barkley ?

[Walken]

This is revisionism.

He's been involved in some horrible performances and we won zero with him. August to December last season he was woeful.

Very selective there, post December he ran games for us

 

[TheFinnFan]

NO.

 

[chicoazul]

you know the answer to that question mr azul, not really worth labouring is it? he scored at home against them, shall we build a statue?

He played well at home against them. He was by far our best player on the park against them in the away game.

So it stands to reason sir that he would have made a positive difference yesterday. This will be the same against many teams.

We're not in a position where we can afford to lose him right now.

 

[Thomasc]

Very selective there, post December he ran games for us

Yes, there are pre and post and he as only really decent in one of them.

 

[Walken]

I believe they call this "form".

Why do all the WOOLS hate on Barkley? Is it scouse envy at play here?

I swear they would be cheering on Kelvin McKenzie if he wrote his Tory article today

 

[chicoazul]

I swear they would be cheering on Kelvin McKenzie if he wrote his Tory article today

It's sickening. Why do the WOOLS even support Everton if they envy and hate scousers so much?

 

[Walken]

Yes, there are pre and post and he as only really decent in one of them.

He was superb post xmas, it's okay to admit it, it's called reality, just because you are all butthurt at him leaving thanks to the be regime, it doesn't change that

 

[Eggs]

Yes and we MUST get to the bottom of it and agree on one opinion Eggs, you know this.

...that would be amazing Matey. Just like RAWK.

 

[COYBL25]

I pose the question though - why is so many WOOLS hate on Barkley so much?

Is there a reason for it? Is it simple scouse envy? I need to understand this phenomenon.

Possibly because their women would love a piece of him and go moist at the mere sight of him ?

 

[ToffeeTim]

Very selective there, post December he ran games for us

He did. But that's why I see him as frustratingly inconsistent.

 

[Thomasc]

He played well at home against them. He was by far our best player on the park against them in the away game.

So it stands to reason sir that he would have made a positive difference yesterday. This will be the same against many teams.

We're not in a position where we can afford to lose him right now.

We will have to agree to disagree, I think he's decent but that is about it. We have signed players to replace him and he wants to leave, no biggy for me, players come and go.

He had some decent games, he had some absolute shockers.

We all wanted him to be our Gerrard, he falls massively short IMO.

 

[chicoazul]

We all wanted him to be our Gerrard, he falls massively short IMO.

Aha. I think we are stumbling close to answers.

 

[bol-uk]

We will have to agree to disagree, I think he's decent but that is about it. We have signed players to replace him and he wants to leave, no biggy for me, players come and go.

He had some decent games, he had some absolute shockers.

We all wanted him to be our Gerrard, he falls massively short IMO.

So did Rom, still went for 90 mil.

Ross is an excellent players but prone to the occasional bad game, saying otherwise just seems daft.

 

[Toast]

And the other 36 league games?

5 goals, 8 assists, wowzer, not even as productive as Joe Allen lol

Welsh Xavi.

 

[billyblue80]

Barkley has no future with us and it's partly his own making , listening to his rat of an agent.