Story checks out.Jeremy Irons must have took a step back from the CEO world and became a Butler for Bruce Wayne.
Story checks out.Jeremy Irons must have took a step back from the CEO world and became a Butler for Bruce Wayne.
If you’re going to mention someone it’s only polite to tag them @Bruce WayneJeremy Irons must have took a step back from the CEO world and became a Butler for Bruce Wayne.
A butler hey ? Fancy metropolitan eliteStory checks out.
Trump doesn’t even know what Project 2025 is…
He's an immigrant too.A butler hey ? Fancy metropolitan elite
Off topic, but those comments in every clip of any movie on youtube from some bore genuinely enrage me.Jeremy Irons must have took a step back from the CEO world and became a Butler for Bruce Wayne.
Said it earlier than that. 2016He’s basically already said that. Dictator on day one. Filling his cabinet with people that will or already have bent the knee.
They also simply don't care until it affects them personallyTrump claims he has no connection to Project 2025 though? That's the rebuttal I see when P2025 comes up, people are very naive
Ah, if only everyone had such a privileged life that they could just make such easy black and white choices.
And the majority are only putting themselves through that, hoping to be able to claim asylum and then bring their families over safely. Imagine being desparate enough, brave enough and loving enough to risk your life to do that
So how much education experience does she have again Zat?
Also went to a lecture last night about reintegrating those released from prison (which like 98% of offenders are ultimately released) and how it's crazy the barriers we put in place that stop people being normal members of society again, then wonder why so many reoffend. For Zat and others, the Peer who gave the talk also complained about the idiotic response from the Mail et al about Labour's release of prisoners in the wake of the riots. I'll paraphrase, the public are largely clueless on these matters, but the media are even worse.
Mcmahon is not the worst pick, so far. I mean, at least she has a bit of gusto and is a bit of an unknown in that world. An outside perspective may help in some cases. It is unknown, I am not confident that she is a sensible pick but there may be something to it, at the best case scenario.
However, your reasoning is just unbelievably stupid. What other films would you say proves that she is experienced enough to be the head of a country's governmental department. Deadpool, Goodfellas, Singing in the Rain?
FYI, Jeremy Irons is an actor, their job is to fake things. I don't think he really was the CEO of the bank in question.
Well, when people are intellectually and even simply broadly challenged then I find it helpful to give examples based on films.
This is something that helps children visualise the point and make it more relatable.
Unfortunately, yourself and one or two others -- with different viewpoints to my own -- dont seem to understand the same logical examples that children do.
Well, when people are intellectually and even simply broadly challenged then I find it helpful to give examples based on films.

There's some fool in the u.s. that keeps having conversations with Hannibal Lecter. Be eating cats and dogs next...The correct example would have been to cite a real world experience where this went well
Oh my word. This is one of the craziest posts ever, that is saying something on here.
I understand the whole point of using examples of fictional situations being compared to real life situations. Like, you may say 'Remember that time in Friends when Chandler fell asleep in a meeting and then accidently nominated himself to head up a new division and they made him move to Tulsa, well imagine that but I don't have to move.'
However, you cannot use a fictional film to justify a real life person being nominated for something, or a real life decision making process. That is not how these examples work. The correct example would have been to cite a real world experience where this went well, i.e. So and so got the justice department job with no previous experience in the area and implemented this and that which are working well.
I mean, if this is your logic then I am all for draconian punishment and locking people up for minor misdemeanours because there was this one episode of Thomas the Tank Engine where they bricked Henry up in a tunnel, it was maybe a bit harsh but nobody else crossed the fat controller after that and that justifies stricter punishments on humans in real life.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.