I don't know though, given the choice of financial security or really big cups of coffee, like, why can't we have both?
Current Affairs The Labour Party
- Thread starter Number_25
- Start date
- Status
I don't know though, given the choice of financial security or really big cups of coffee, like, why can't we have both?
It might be worth weighing up the multitude of harms and then seeing that labours hand has been forced because of the corruption fraud and waste of the previous idiots.
Then the videos, oh the videos. smashed avocado, grande latte coffees, racist stop and searches, impossible house ownership, decayed working conditions, these are what have been referenced, yet you've jumped in the deep end two footed and wonder why you can't keep up.
It's only 1700 pages long, just do the last 600. Up to speed in no time.
I'm not stupid. I know what you are referring to, but your posts are frankly embarrassing and insensitive to those older people that truly struggle. I know you don't care about that, but I do understand social injustice, and it's not the same as the faux concern that you use use to score points on an internet forum.
StDomingosGringo
Player Valuation: £10m
I don’t think there’s a single person in this thread that wants to see vulnerable pensioners suffer.
But equally all admit there are wealthy pensioners getting a payment they don’t & have never needed.
A threshold to separate the two was decided & while there will always some that fall just the wrong side there appears to still be support.
The Tories bribed the older demographic for decades while creating more inequality by gutting services & safety nets more likely to be needed by working age families. All while waving through an agenda that enriched the already wealthy even without the corrupt back room deals to friends.
Then just as their voting influence could have began to wane the majority supported becoming the only country in history to impose economic sanctions on itself.
All in this together to the sunny uplands guys.
But equally all admit there are wealthy pensioners getting a payment they don’t & have never needed.
A threshold to separate the two was decided & while there will always some that fall just the wrong side there appears to still be support.
The Tories bribed the older demographic for decades while creating more inequality by gutting services & safety nets more likely to be needed by working age families. All while waving through an agenda that enriched the already wealthy even without the corrupt back room deals to friends.
Then just as their voting influence could have began to wane the majority supported becoming the only country in history to impose economic sanctions on itself.
All in this together to the sunny uplands guys.
I agree with most of that, but there are clearly 2 people in this thread that do want to see vulnerable pensioners suffer, or are just incredibly insensitive to their struggle.
StDomingosGringo
Player Valuation: £10m
This is another continuation of a policy already in place according to the minister who answered the question in the Commons. Interestingly it was from the Tory MP for 93% white Salisbury.
It’s not a new position targeting this particular group who claim not to have been responded to. Just in case anyone got mislead.
It’s not a new position targeting this particular group who claim not to have been responded to. Just in case anyone got mislead.
Sleep it off Pete. Dont go near any open fires you'll go up like the Olympic flame. Make sure you ask the wife to roll you on your side.
Considerate and thoughtful advice for you.
His majesty can probably barely string a sentence together at this point.
StDomingosGringo
Player Valuation: £10m
Don’t think so brother. Insensitive comment but made after being provoked. Not by you just to be clear.
Give me a minute please...
- Status