The Guardian pretty much nails it in one...

Status
Not open for further replies.

ToffeeDan

in memoriam - 1961-2023
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2013/may/06/ten-talking-points-premier-league

[h=2]Everton could be so much more if they were proactive[/h]Everton are now almost certain to finish above Liverpool in the top division for the second season in a row, the first time they've pulled off this particular trick since 1937. This no doubt gives some of the Goodison faithful that long-awaited opportunity to dust off a chant of "We all agree/Lawton is better than Nieuwenhuys/Où sont les neiges d'antan?", but others may question the exact relevance of the stat to the modern world.


After all, while a little more bragging rights are always welcome, it's not been much of a bar for Everton to clear: rather like their counterparts of the 1930s, this Liverpool team are nothing to write home about. It's also worth noting that Everton's 1937 vintage went on to win the title two years later, something the cream of 2013 won't be doing any time soon.


For a side with Champions League pretentions, the modern Toffeemen are strangely toothless up front, a reactive side rather than a bunch of go-getters, which is maybe why a campaign that promised so much will end up delivering nothing.


To illustrate the point, Manchester United, Manchester City, Chelsea, Arsenal and Tottenham have all scored twice at Anfield this season. Everton's draw there is no worse than City or Chelsea's result, and it gave them a point more than Spurs managed, but the lack of cutting edge has cost them over the long haul: Everton have lost fewer games than anybody bar United and City, and it wouldn't have taken too many draws turned into wins to nudge them up past their more free-scoring rivals and into third.

It might be too much to ask of David Moyes to unearth the new Tommy Lawton – and anyway, as Sylvain Distin will attest, he'd not get many decisions these days – but Everton desperately need some extra firepower (and perhaps a more proactive attitude) if they're to best their red rivals for a third year in a row and, surely more importantly, make it back into the Champions League.
 

well put from the Redcoat rag the signs were there in January and nothing was done, but the TV deal means theirs no excuse for Ken****e not to give moyes the money to bring in a top class striker and not some £4 mil signing from scotland
 
Is tomorrow Tuesday ?

Does it get dark after it is light ?

Is the earth round ?

Do we need a new striker ?

These are all rhetorical questions.
 

For a side with Champions League pretentions, the modern Toffeemen are strangely toothless up front, a reactive side rather than a bunch of go-getters, which is maybe why a campaign that promised so much will end up delivering nothing.


I don't think the journo is talking about Kenwright or our finances but about the negativity of the tactics.

In short, that is a veiled, yet well warranted, attack on the consrvatism of the manager this season.

We should have had more points this season and would have done with a more positive outlook at Norwich in particular.
 
ToffeeDan;1927677For a side with Champions League pretentions said:
Hurts, but true. Toothless up front, bad decision making from management during the game, and an inability to see out a game without giving away silly goals in the tail end of too many games.

Club for sale?
 
Last edited:
3 attacking minded players in transfer window and i'd f*cking be looking forward to next season and possibly a holding mid and a cb when heitinga goes
 
We should have gone for the jugular from the kick off (as we did at Villa after the great start against Man U). Sometimes we start too slowly or joust too much - there is a fine balance between working your way into a game and taking it by the scruff of the neck. I'd rather we went for every game and won 2 out of 3 instead of perhaps setting out our stall to avoid defeat in some (away matches in particular). We don't always need adversity to perform but we've been losing in a lot of games and come back to get point(s).
 

Moyes sets us up cautiously hence opportunities come and go thats what this is about, his cup campaigns are lessons in how to fill your pants.

This season has been the worst standard ever our 6th to 9th berth has been untroubled another manager might have "gone for it" to get CL but it's not Moyes.

Need a change while the squad still has some legs to see if they are all that or just overrated gimps.
 
I don't know if Moyes is afraid to spoil his legacy - would a cavalier gung-ho type spirit - so rarely seen by the team on away days (4-4 at Old Trafford, Villa, and one or two other lesser opponent away days in recent times) - have brought us a chance of 4th (or, of course, a chance of 10th) - hell, 4th and 10th has got to be better than 7th and 7th hasn't it?
 
Ah yes the old - Moyes should just go for it - argument.

Not only should he get us to finish 15 points clear of all the other teams with similar budgets but he should get the team to score another 20 goals a season whilst playing with reckless abandon. Is that really fair?

We've scored 52 league goals and conceded 38.

That is more scored than everyone outside of the 5 teams ahead of us and Liverpool.

Only United, City, Chelsea and Arsenal have let in fewer.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top