If Ghost and Damon are good debaters, then debating must just be code for the repetitive assertion of a single, unchanging opinion.
In my opinion, to debate is to offer up contrasting opinions, to respond to said contrasting opinions and to ultimately enhance your own opinion by taking on board the opinions of others, and new information. In that respect I think there's a lot of good debaters on here, but Ghost and Damon are definitely not two of them. They're the antithesis to that. They both make some very good points themselves, but when they disagree with someone (which happens a lot), they're just unmovable objects with tunnel vision.
But if you want to hammer home a single opinion, then get Damon on the case. Not Ghost, because he gets himself banned.