Dual purpose. Standing is better atmosphere wise at the back and closer to the roof. Also, behind the goal in the stand which is advertised as the Home End there will be more exuberance than at the sides, so you have the safety aspect too
I get that standing is more conducive for atmosphere, but if you want standing on the upper, then as it currently is, you would need to reduce the rake of the stands.
Put safety barriers in by all means, but if that encouraged standing, then they would have to actively discourage standing, with a number of options, to maintain a safety certificate.
I guess the question is, when asked what you wanted, was your answer a full standing stadium, or a stadium that replicated the feeling of being close to the action with steep stands. You can't have one without compromising on the other, unfortunately.
I'm not sure choosing to compromise one over the other can be labelled a disgrace tbh, it's just a difference in approach.