Suarez's Punishment
- Thread starter Kendall's Dream
- Start date
- Status
ScouseBlueBoy
Player Valuation: £15m
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/28021284
Dear Gordon Taylor - wouldn't you be better being more concerned about the possibility of PFA members being bitten than by what might happen to the biter?
Dodgy as, that bloke.
"David Usher, owner of fanzine The Liverpool Way, believes the club should stick with their troubled striker, adding: "He needs help and he may as well get it from Liverpool rather than somewhere else"."
Yeah mate - that worked before didn't it.
Dear Gordon Taylor - wouldn't you be better being more concerned about the possibility of PFA members being bitten than by what might happen to the biter?
Dodgy as, that bloke.
"David Usher, owner of fanzine The Liverpool Way, believes the club should stick with their troubled striker, adding: "He needs help and he may as well get it from Liverpool rather than somewhere else"."
Yeah mate - that worked before didn't it.
bluelife
Player Valuation: £40m
Not if they do it for something like a whole season, but I suppose it's more likely they'll just do 5 games or something.
sbbefc
Player Valuation: £30m
If he's banned internationally for a whole season his value will go up as he will be fresher for club games and will reduce the chances of injury.
bluelife
Player Valuation: £40m
Oh sorry I mistook international to mean in all leagues as opposed to just Uruguay games! Yeah would be a disaster if it was just international
No way in the world this ban will be anything other than International games.
Sadly mouts I think you'll be correct. There'll be lawsuits aplenty if they try and stop him playing domestically. He deserves it like
So how many times does he need to be caught biting (assaulting another player in a manner every 6yo child is taught not to, at that) before we do give him a long term ban?
What would my ban be if he bit me, then I turned around and smashed his nose? Probably longer than the total of his two prior biting bans.
My two cents. Next time we're up big or down big vs LP and he's on teh pitch, sub out one of our players for Mongo. Have Mongo take the pitch with no intent but to smash him. Knock his chiclets out. Take a mssive suspension and never pay for a beer in a Blue bar again.
Alternately, maybe someone who has been bitten should just charge him with assault and battery.
Millions of kids all over the world are now biting each other in the parks and on the fields.
Thanks a lot Sewerz.
Thanks a lot Sewerz.
mythbuster
Player Valuation: £35m
From the Echo:
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/how-long-could-liverpool-fc-7325933
According to Article 136 of the 2011 Fifa Disciplinary Code, it states: “If the infringement is serious, in particular but not limited to doping, unlawfully influencing match results, misconduct against match officials, forgery and falsification or violation of the rules governing age limits, the associations, confederations, and other organising sports bodies shall request Fifa to extend the sanctions they have imposed so as to have worldwide effect.”
This is the crucial point. If Suarez's infringement is considered serious enough and he is banned from international competition by Fifa, then both the FA and Uefa will be able to ask Fifa to extend the sanctions already imposed, to have a worldwide effect.
The FA and Uefa would apply individually to ban him from their respective competitions – the Premier League and Champions League respectively – but it would be under the jurisdiction of Fifa to accept that.
So, it is possible any ban would only apply to international fixtures, but the FA and Uefa could ensure he is also banned for Liverpool too.
However, Article 136 continues: “If the judicial bodies of Fifa discover that associations, confederations and other sports organisations have not requested a decision to be extended to have worldwide effect, these bodies may themselves pass a decision.”
This would suggest that if the associations elect not to appeal to Fifa, the world governing body would still be able to extend that ban from international football into a global ban of its own accord.
While Fifa are likeliest to impose a global ban if requested to – and therefore see him unavailable for Liverpool – they may also choose to do so themselves.
If that happens, Suarez must have previously had the opportunity to “state his case”, as pertains to Article 137 of the 2011 Fifa Disciplinary Code: “The request for sanctions to be extended will be approved if:
a) the person sanctioned has been cited properly;
b) he has had the opportunity to state his case (with the exception of
provisional measures);
c) the decision has been communicated properly;
d) the decision complies with the regulations of FIFA;
e) extending the sanction does not conflict with public order and accepted standards of behaviour.”
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/how-long-could-liverpool-fc-7325933
According to Article 136 of the 2011 Fifa Disciplinary Code, it states: “If the infringement is serious, in particular but not limited to doping, unlawfully influencing match results, misconduct against match officials, forgery and falsification or violation of the rules governing age limits, the associations, confederations, and other organising sports bodies shall request Fifa to extend the sanctions they have imposed so as to have worldwide effect.”
This is the crucial point. If Suarez's infringement is considered serious enough and he is banned from international competition by Fifa, then both the FA and Uefa will be able to ask Fifa to extend the sanctions already imposed, to have a worldwide effect.
The FA and Uefa would apply individually to ban him from their respective competitions – the Premier League and Champions League respectively – but it would be under the jurisdiction of Fifa to accept that.
So, it is possible any ban would only apply to international fixtures, but the FA and Uefa could ensure he is also banned for Liverpool too.
However, Article 136 continues: “If the judicial bodies of Fifa discover that associations, confederations and other sports organisations have not requested a decision to be extended to have worldwide effect, these bodies may themselves pass a decision.”
This would suggest that if the associations elect not to appeal to Fifa, the world governing body would still be able to extend that ban from international football into a global ban of its own accord.
While Fifa are likeliest to impose a global ban if requested to – and therefore see him unavailable for Liverpool – they may also choose to do so themselves.
If that happens, Suarez must have previously had the opportunity to “state his case”, as pertains to Article 137 of the 2011 Fifa Disciplinary Code: “The request for sanctions to be extended will be approved if:
a) the person sanctioned has been cited properly;
b) he has had the opportunity to state his case (with the exception of
provisional measures);
c) the decision has been communicated properly;
d) the decision complies with the regulations of FIFA;
e) extending the sanction does not conflict with public order and accepted standards of behaviour.”
Efcbradley89
Player Valuation: £5m
Messi just makes this man look an absolute tool. Does all his talking on the pitch. Don't ask him to pay tax like cause he just won't do it.
thirdmantackle
Player Valuation: £35m
If FIFA give him a worldwide ban, he'll just transfer to another planet to play in Blatter's Interplanetary Universe Cup
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
