Your point makes no sense as Lukaku is a far superior player who fits Martinez's style yet was woeful in that game and fell over his own feet numerous times. You need horses for courses and Naismith for all his limitations can score against the big boysIf we just look at ability then i cant actually understand why people want to keep Naismith? He's clearly not got the basic requirements that suit our style of play and infact negates attacks due to his lack of ability on the ball compared to the players around him.
As others have said, he'd be ideal for a Bounemouth or a Sunderland who need a player like him.
Where exactly is he supposed to play for us? Backup to Lukaku or Barkley i suppose but he is nowhere near their quality...
To me, it makes far more sense to now look for £8-10mil from another club and move him on. With the TV money increasing and other factors we should be able to easily add to that amount and sign someone to PROVIDE COMPETITION to Barkley and/or Lukaku instead of a backup.
@Layne i'm lost on your Chelsea game comment basically saying if he wasnt playing we would have drawn? If we replaced him with a far superior player who fitted Martinez style better then how do we know the scoreline wouldnt have still been in our favour and we would more likely have more points now on the board now as well...
I'm sure he's great to have around the squad personality wise but surely the incoming player will also have his temperament researched and if top quality would provide a lift to the squad.
I doubt John Stones or Lukaku are thinking to stay at Everton because Naismith is a "nice chap" but perhaps would do if a top player was brought in...
Your point makes no sense as Lukaku is a far superior player who fits Martinez's style yet was woeful in that game and fell over his own feet numerous times. You need horses for courses and Naismith for all his limitations can score against the big boys
League games just off wiki...this goalscoring threat is a real myth when looking at overall seasons...and other than running around and scoring this amount of goals he offers little playing wise.
2012/13 - Played 31 = 4 goals
2013/14 - Played 31 = 5 goals
2014/15 - Played 31 = 6 goals
2015/16 - Played 9 = 3 goals
I think a better player than Naismith would improve the team and even if he didnt score himself would improve our attacking threat allowing others to score.
Saying lukaku was dreadful so a better player than Naismith may not have scored 3 goals is fair enough. He may well have done though, also other players may have done...its all hypothetical. Naismith did it and well played...fantastic, but thats a one off game. Does that also mean if McGeady had a great game we should keep him?
What seems clear to me is that we need a better player than Naismith to compete with Lukaku /Barkley and not just be a backup. We need to continuously keep improving the quality behind the 1st eleven.
If we just look at ability then i cant actually understand why people want to keep Naismith? He's clearly not got the basic requirements that suit our style of play and infact negates attacks due to his lack of ability on the ball compared to the players around him.
As others have said, he'd be ideal for a Bounemouth or a Sunderland who need a player like him.
Where exactly is he supposed to play for us? Backup to Lukaku or Barkley i suppose but he is nowhere near their quality...
To me, it makes far more sense to now look for £8-10mil from another club and move him on. With the TV money increasing and other factors we should be able to easily add to that amount and sign someone to PROVIDE COMPETITION to Barkley and/or Lukaku instead of a backup.
@Layne i'm lost on your Chelsea game comment basically saying if he wasnt playing we would have drawn? If we replaced him with a far superior player who fitted Martinez style better then how do we know the scoreline wouldnt have still been in our favour and we would more likely have more points now on the board now as well...
I'm sure he's great to have around the squad personality wise but surely the incoming player will also have his temperament researched and if top quality would provide a lift to the squad.
I doubt John Stones or Lukaku are thinking to stay at Everton because Naismith is a "nice chap" but perhaps would do if a top player was brought in...
You've gone black and white with his appearance stats, I like that. Makes him look like he played more than he did.
In 12/13 and 13/14, he STARTED 13 games and made 18 sub appearances. Played about 1300 minutes, that's not even 15 full games.
He's a useful squad player, good finisher and a fighter. That's why I like him in the squad as an option.
Think he's something different, mate. He's a work horse who'll come on, challenge for every ball, play rough, is good in the air and will wind the opposition right up.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.