Boss_Blue
I will find you and consensually bum you
Would you like us to keep Koeman mate?All managers will be short term if you keep on wanting them sacked after a season.
Would you like us to keep Koeman mate?All managers will be short term if you keep on wanting them sacked after a season.
Todays article in the mail confirms that Koeman told agents during the summer that he was in charge of recruitment.
It certainly looks like other than running the scouting and perhaps having a small budget to make signings, Walsh isn't responsible.
Which raises the question of what is Walsh for?Todays article in the mail confirms that Koeman told agents during the summer that he was in charge of recruitment.
It certainly looks like other than running the scouting and perhaps having a small budget to make signings, Walsh isn't responsible.
Which raises the question of what is Walsh for?
Of course. But wasn’t he brought in with that in mind - if I remember he was sold to us as a less-than-orthodox DOF to be in partial charge of incomings, unearthing hidden gems etc.Director of Football isn’t solely there for transfers.
Of course. But wasn’t he brought in with that in mind - if I remember he was sold to us as a less-than-orthodox DOF to be in partial charge of incomings, unearthing hidden gems etc.
I’m not against him, just wondering.
Agree with all thatYes don’t get me wrong I find the transfer heirarchy a little odd but I think what he’s changed so far with restructuring the scouting system etc. as a decent accomplishment.
Shouts for his head are premature IMO. I’d like to see what he can do when working with a less powerful/stubborn manager.
Which raises the question of what is Walsh for?
How many of our incomings have been "Walsh" as opposed to "Koeman" signings? Rumour has it that RK was pushing for Sig and Martina would deffo have been an RK signing. How many more? Klaassen too perhaps.
Has he signed a single quality player