H.H.
Player Valuation: £10m
Nah, don't try to deflect from its content...
Go on then, I have ten minutes so please explain what content made it a strange post?
Nah, don't try to deflect from its content...
Their hearts not being in it could be true but I think it's just that Spurs have a fair few players not anywhere near Kane's standard.
I've said for a couple of years now, a player of he's standard should leave for a better club and not many Spurs fans will have the hump with him when he does.
He was pretty good at the World Cup in Russia. Since then he's been extremely poor and it's hard to work out.
Their hearts not being in it could be true but I think it's just that Spurs have a fair few players not anywhere near Kane's standard.
I've said for a couple of years now, a player of he's standard should leave for a better club and not many Spurs fans will have the hump with him when he does.
I'd be a bit concerned with his ankle injuries in recent years too. He's still a top level finisher, but his mobility doesn't look as good to me and he struggles with the pace of the game at times. He'd obviously improve City, United or Big Red etc, but maybe not by enough for them to pay the 80 or 90m Spurs would expect.
Wouldn't it be better to make a few headline signatures to give them hope that you as a club want to reach the highest level again? If you get hundreds of millions for them then you could use that money to build a whole new team I suppose but ideally you want to build around the star players you have already got.
Hello Tim. We all have different opinions but I think the reason is simply that the players behind him are simply not good enough to be able to give him the ball enough. Sunday's game was yet another example of that. No service at all.
Yeah the Spurs midfield didn't help him either. He was very tired in the second half too but that can be put down to week 1 and a lack of preseason. If Spurs keep him fit he will still score an awful lot of goals, but his injuries would be a concern for me too.
Just look at my many previous posts about my dislike for Levy and there's your answer.
A couple of years ago we had the chance to join the top clubs but Levy again decided not to spend and he is happy to just tread water. Spurs are going nowhere.
At the current moment I don't see that as a realistic price, so I don't think he will leave Spurs as he doesn't seem the type to force the issue. How long is the contract that he is on? That will probably be the biggest determinant of his price if a club wanted him.Oh and I think your comment of Spurs wanting £80-£90 million for him is well low.
If he goes it will be for a lot more than £100million (IMO.)
That annoyed me for two reasons; the ref just allowed him to raise his hands to a number of our players despite Richie being hobbled by Hojbjerg, and the meek reaction of our team who just appeared to take it from the 'big star'.Are there any clips of Kane pushing everyone? Soft get.
At the current moment I don't see that as a realistic price, so I don't think he will leave Spurs as he doesn't seem the type to force the issue. How long is the contract that he is on? That will probably be the biggest determinant of his price if a club wanted him.
Chelsea have just paid £72 million for an attacking not yet proven in the premier league midfielder and if you think Kane's price will only be be about £10 million more than that then fair enough.
Kane has about four years left on his contract.
The thing is though, Havertz is probably one of Europe's hottest prorties and is 20. Kane is 27, increasingly injury prone and looks as if he may have just passed his peak.
Havertz will be doing very very well if he replicates what Kane has done, but the prices are more reflective of where both are at in terms of their careers.