A few glaring issues with Dyche that I think need addressing. The lack of getting points when going behind in games. Part of that can be aimed at the quality of personnel but look at Coventry at wolves on the weekend? I would say it's more of an issue to do with tactics and mentality which is on the manager.
Secondly the lack of goals from strikers. Yes they have missed a few but is enough being done to ensure they are match ready both mentally and physically. When big Dunc left I felt it was the right decision. However I'm now starting to wonder if it was. We probably need a striking coach who can help get the best out of these lot as they aren't doing the business.
This is a universal problem in football - not just Dyche. The likelihood of a team in the bottom half (and generally, but lower for worse teams than top teams) of the table coming back from conceding a goal first is very low.
Herein lies the very essence of how a manager must constantly find equilibrium between balance and imbalance, and how the team chooses tactics.
Liverpool can e.g. in most matches stand 1 on 1 against the attacking players, and usually do this without any particular risk because they are better individual players. Isolate
Tarkowski against Haaland (and quite a few PL attackers), and you have the definition of madness. Put DCL up in one on one situations against PL CB, how many does he win? We can do this for all players.
Different models can then be used to compensate. Then you have to ask yourself, what are Everton's strengths? We don't have very many technical and creative players, do we have any? We also don't have many players with great pace. However, what we have is a bunch of players who have great work capacity, and a squad that has the highest average height in the PL.
Looking at the strengths and weaknesses, Dyche's style is not very illogical. Defensively solid, crosses in the box, transitions and set pieces. People here argue for the illogical. To force together pieces that do not fit.