Elong
The fire rises
I see you're in a good mood again today mucker.....
This is a good thread to let it all out homies.
Say something controversial - round 2
- Thread starter sageyefc
- Start date
- Status
This is a good thread to let it all out homies.
Kiwi
Say NO to Ginger Managers
I liked it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
tommye
Player Valuation: £120m
#HobbitFight
#MawdorMurder
Elong
The fire rises
#Tarantinoisaracist
summerisle
The rain, it raineth every day
In the coming four years I will follow avidly the following :
Triathlon, Hockey, Taekwando, Cycling, Women's hammer, 10,000 metres, pentathlon, long jump, sailing, canoeing, swimming, diving, badminton, rugby 7's, gymnastics, rowing, golf, tennis, judo and shooting, because I have always liked them and am considered an expert.
Triathlon, Hockey, Taekwando, Cycling, Women's hammer, 10,000 metres, pentathlon, long jump, sailing, canoeing, swimming, diving, badminton, rugby 7's, gymnastics, rowing, golf, tennis, judo and shooting, because I have always liked them and am considered an expert.
thebluenosebolt
prefer being behind the times
Serena williams...
She might look like mike tyson in a tutu.....i still would
She might look like mike tyson in a tutu.....i still would
tommye
Player Valuation: £120m
Add archery and open water swimming and I'm in.
tadao
Player Valuation: £25m
This behaviour is rife, without mentioning names of course 
I actually find that there are two classes of people who cause maximum trouble on forums. One is of course, the traditional "troll" who wreaks havoc by anti-social behaviour and by deliberately riling up forum members to get kicks out of it, causing havoc and bad blood in the process.
I think as admins, we need to realize that there is another group which I would term as "online bullies" or "internet bullies" who can become equally destructive in undermining communities.
These gentlemen/ladies differ from trolls in the sense that they are not anti-social, but they are an accepted and sometimes well-respected members who assume a sort of informal and unofficial leadership role. They use this position to intimidate and assert their views on newer and less established members and often push their weight around to mark territorial rights. They will generally try and behave properly, but subtly try and behave like moderators and preach about forum behaviour. They will also turn and insult people as they wish and surprisingly other forum members will turn a blind eye to them. They will usually "adopt" ownership of a single forum or a subforum of a board and hang out there frequently with their clan. (this feature is usually more common in larger forums)
These people are often the starting point of cliques because they can gather a group of yes-people around them in no time.
I actually find that there are two classes of people who cause maximum trouble on forums. One is of course, the traditional "troll" who wreaks havoc by anti-social behaviour and by deliberately riling up forum members to get kicks out of it, causing havoc and bad blood in the process.
I think as admins, we need to realize that there is another group which I would term as "online bullies" or "internet bullies" who can become equally destructive in undermining communities.
These gentlemen/ladies differ from trolls in the sense that they are not anti-social, but they are an accepted and sometimes well-respected members who assume a sort of informal and unofficial leadership role. They use this position to intimidate and assert their views on newer and less established members and often push their weight around to mark territorial rights. They will generally try and behave properly, but subtly try and behave like moderators and preach about forum behaviour. They will also turn and insult people as they wish and surprisingly other forum members will turn a blind eye to them. They will usually "adopt" ownership of a single forum or a subforum of a board and hang out there frequently with their clan. (this feature is usually more common in larger forums)
These people are often the starting point of cliques because they can gather a group of yes-people around them in no time.
summerisle
The rain, it raineth every day
Did 'we' win in those ratings' winning sports ?
Garymc2412
Player Valuation: £1.5m
I've forgotten about rugby sevens already its crap we only got silver
Hockey and show jumping is now
Hockey and show jumping is now
thebluenosebolt
prefer being behind the times
Wrong thread mate...there is a perfect thread round the corner....it's called the clique thread. lolThis behaviour is rife, without mentioning names of course
I actually find that there are two classes of people who cause maximum trouble on forums. One is of course, the traditional "troll" who wreaks havoc by anti-social behaviour and by deliberately riling up forum members to get kicks out of it, causing havoc and bad blood in the process.
I think as admins, we need to realize that there is another group which I would term as "online bullies" or "internet bullies" who can become equally destructive in undermining communities.
These gentlemen/ladies differ from trolls in the sense that they are not anti-social, but they are an accepted and sometimes well-respected members who assume a sort of informal and unofficial leadership role. They use this position to intimidate and assert their views on newer and less established members and often push their weight around to mark territorial rights. They will generally try and behave properly, but subtly try and behave like moderators and preach about forum behaviour. They will also turn and insult people as they wish and surprisingly other forum members will turn a blind eye to them. They will usually "adopt" ownership of a single forum or a subforum of a board and hang out there frequently with their clan. (this feature is usually more common in larger forums)
These people are often the starting point of cliques because they can gather a group of yes-people around them in no time.
tommye
Player Valuation: £120m
Erm....
Can't remember tbh. Seems weeks ago. Think the Koreans smashed it in the archery and we didn't do too bad in the splashy one. Still worth watching at 3am though.
tommye
Player Valuation: £120m
Wtf?This behaviour is rife, without mentioning names of course
I actually find that there are two classes of people who cause maximum trouble on forums. One is of course, the traditional "troll" who wreaks havoc by anti-social behaviour and by deliberately riling up forum members to get kicks out of it, causing havoc and bad blood in the process.
I think as admins, we need to realize that there is another group which I would term as "online bullies" or "internet bullies" who can become equally destructive in undermining communities.
These gentlemen/ladies differ from trolls in the sense that they are not anti-social, but they are an accepted and sometimes well-respected members who assume a sort of informal and unofficial leadership role. They use this position to intimidate and assert their views on newer and less established members and often push their weight around to mark territorial rights. They will generally try and behave properly, but subtly try and behave like moderators and preach about forum behaviour. They will also turn and insult people as they wish and surprisingly other forum members will turn a blind eye to them. They will usually "adopt" ownership of a single forum or a subforum of a board and hang out there frequently with their clan. (this feature is usually more common in larger forums)
These people are often the starting point of cliques because they can gather a group of yes-people around them in no time.
@bizzaroThis behaviour is rife, without mentioning names of course
I actually find that there are two classes of people who cause maximum trouble on forums. One is of course, the traditional "troll" who wreaks havoc by anti-social behaviour and by deliberately riling up forum members to get kicks out of it, causing havoc and bad blood in the process.
I think as admins, we need to realize that there is another group which I would term as "online bullies" or "internet bullies" who can become equally destructive in undermining communities.
These gentlemen/ladies differ from trolls in the sense that they are not anti-social, but they are an accepted and sometimes well-respected members who assume a sort of informal and unofficial leadership role. They use this position to intimidate and assert their views on newer and less established members and often push their weight around to mark territorial rights. They will generally try and behave properly, but subtly try and behave like moderators and preach about forum behaviour. They will also turn and insult people as they wish and surprisingly other forum members will turn a blind eye to them. They will usually "adopt" ownership of a single forum or a subforum of a board and hang out there frequently with their clan. (this feature is usually more common in larger forums)
These people are often the starting point of cliques because they can gather a group of yes-people around them in no time.
thebluenosebolt
prefer being behind the times
It started with a smily face ...I'm sure it wasnt meant.....deep breaths
- Status