orly
Please check with me for Blammo criteria
How come the best players have the best stats then?
And betting companies (profitable ones) create entire models based on statistics.
How come the best players have the best stats then?
How come the best players have the best stats then?
So come on then - those who don't rate Ross at all - who would you rather have playing for us in his position?
Realistic signing currently an active player in world football.
And betting companies (profitable ones) create entire models based on statistics.
Not true at all, Iniesta's goals and assist stats are rubbish and he's one of the best midfielders of his generation.
Mate there's been games he wasn't the 19th best footballer on the pitch never mind top leagues all together.http://www.squawka.com/football-pla...05/2016#season#1#all-matches#total#desc#total
This one has Ross as the 19th best player in all top leagues last season. Yet he was average according to some.
That is why stats stopped measuring only goals and assists about a decade ago. Iniesta is ranked as one of the best players around by measuring stats such as pass completion and direction, ball retention, key passes etc
http://www.squawka.com/players/andr...#season-2012/2013#4#all-matches#1-38#by-match
Juan Manuel Mata
That is why stats stopped measuring only goals and assists about a decade ago. Iniesta is ranked as one of the best players around by measuring stats such as pass completion and direction, ball retention, key passes etc
http://www.squawka.com/players/andr...#season-2012/2013#4#all-matches#1-38#by-match
Mate there's been games he wasn't the 19th best footballer on the pitch never mind top leagues all together.
So why do people keep coming on here and telling us Barkley is as good as Gerrard, Lampard Scholes because he's scored as many at the age of 22?
So why do people keep coming on here and telling us Barkley is as good as Gerrard, Lampard Scholes because he's scored as many at the age of 22?
No, they keep saying that he is as good as them when they were also 22, and that we can't yet be certain if he will be as good as them at age 30 when he gets there in 8 years time.
Not massively sure what the confusion is here.
But the thing is, he is not as good as they were at 22 is he? If people are being brutally honest with themselves. That's not saying he's crap, those were top players contributing massively to their teams winning trophies.
Statistically, he is.
He's 22, he's got what 20 England caps, he hit double figures for assists and goals last year and he's an evertonian.
Let's be honest, do people really have a recollection of how Gerrard, Lampard and Scholes were playing at 22?? In the latter's case, he was playing in one of the finest sides this country has produced, managed by arguably the best manager of his generation and at 22 I imagine he was playing alongside Roy Keane, who could carry him through the weaker games. Barry is fantastic but he's not Roy Keane at his peak level.
Barkley is already a fantastic player. If he is still making these errors at 26, 27, then we worry.