2019/20 Richarlison

[TheBigIguana]

The hipster crowd that say Brands is following the Ajax model of developing youngsters and selling them for mega bucks, forget that they actually win leagues and get to cup finals. We actually don't do anything at all but remain in the EPL. I'd keep him no matter what. If losing Gueye has effected this bad imagine losing him.

Richarlison fits into that model. He's 22.

 

[PhilRegan]

Richarlison fits into that model. He's 22.

Completely skimmed over the whole meaning of the post.

 

[PITA]

Totally this, 130 million at least, but then I still feel we should keep hold of him, why can’t they want Sigs.

They want to but are put off because he is injured.

 

[bol-uk]

Richarlison fits into that model. He's 22.

He’s Marco not brands though

 

[TheBigIguana]

He’s Marco not brands though

No. Either every signing after Brands took over is his or none of them are. This game where we try to determine who wanted which player is silly without being inside the club.

 

[PITA]

Nope, they all requested to leave, ultimately we had no choice

Like StevieMe.

 

[PITA]

Yer because that's the same

Correct.

 

[Goat]

No. Either every signing after Brands took over is his or none of them are. This game where we try to determine who wanted which player is silly without being inside the club.

Indeed, its a joke.

Brands has signed every single player since he joined, he gets the credit and he gets the blame.

Marco Silva signed Alex Iwobi tho.

 

[PITA]

He’s a red mate

Who? Do you mean codpiece?

 

[crazyguy]

£100m and I say SELL, SELL, SELL!

Fake news or not, it would never be a true 100m. It would be something like a guaranteed 40 million, and then 60 million in bogus clauses. Barcelona is bent like that. Thats why they can do one now, and in the future.

 

[bol-uk]

No. Either every signing after Brands took over is his or none of them are. This game where we try to determine who wanted which player is silly without being inside the club.

So you think Brands wanted Richarlison and not Marco? Just cos Brands was there it was 100% Marco who would have pushed for Rich, common sense will tell you that mate.

Aslo, not a GAME as you suggest, just obvious stuff really

 

[TheBigIguana]

So you think Brands wanted Richarlison and not Marco? Just cos Brands was there it was 100% Marco who would have pushed for Rich, common sense will tell you that mate.

Aslo, not a GAME as you suggest, just obvious stuff really

Well why don't you go ahead and split up the rest of the signings so I know who gets credit/blame

 

[Goat]

So you think Brands wanted Richarlison and not Marco? Just cos Brands was there it was 100% Marco who would have pushed for Rich, common sense will tell you that mate.

Aslo, not a GAME as you suggest, just obvious stuff really

Brands tried to sign Rico before he went to Watford, but he couldnt match Watfords offer.

 

[bol-uk]

Well why don't you go ahead and split up the rest of the signings so I know who gets credit/blame

Why would I? WHo cares? The point is, giving brands credit for Richie (which you wre) is mad when it is obvious to the world that Marco wanted him to foolow him from Watford.

I swear, you argue with your reflection in the mirror when brushing your teeth, literally say ANYTHING to be objectionable.

 

[Fansince1988]

Why is the Peterbough owner talking about the Richarlison bid lol , surely they could have got a higher profile owner to ask lol