He's a smashing little footballer. As good as any player in the last ten years, I'd say anyway.
Zidane?
He's a smashing little footballer. As good as any player in the last ten years, I'd say anyway.
He's in that company, mate..and they weren't too shabby if you saw them play and remember them.
Still a long way to go until immortalised as a football God with Diego, Pele and Cruyff.
He's in that company, mate..and they weren't too shabby if you saw them play and remember them.
Still a long way to go until immortalised as a football God with Diego, Pele and Cruyff.
The potential to be the best of them all is right there, and he seems to want to fulfil it.
The past few weeks have instilled a complete hatred of Barcelona in me, but ffs Messi is out of this world. I don't care who he plays for. Maradona had the 80s, Zidane the 90s and Ronaldihno and Henry probably had the best of the early 00s, but now the late 00s/10s belong to Messi. He craps all over the last two, and although a different kind of player I'd say he's going to be even better than Zizou (even though Zidane is still my favourite) and if he continues the way he is doing he will surely surpass Maradona, too.
I'm talking in terms of the individual here, not trophy hauls. Michael Carrick has a champions league medal ffs.[/QUOTE]
Christian Karembeu has 2 CL winner's medals, A world cup winners medal and a European Nations cup winner's medal. According to some people's criteria on here that makes him better than Messi, Cruyff, Best, Platini, Zico and a whole host of others
Why surprised? He's easily good enough to be included in that company.
52 goals, and 25 assists this season and still playng - thats just simply unbelievable.
Zidane?
The thing is though, you look at teams like Real and Barca, and in my opinion they are stronger than international sides. If you compare the Barca lineup (for instance) to the Spanish one that won the World Cup, in my opinion only the goalkeeper is stronger man for man.
I think the Champions League is a higher quality tournament than the World Cup. You have better quality teams on display (none of the lesser nations present), the players are much more familiar with each other so play to a better standard (see England as a case in point), and as the tournament is during the season the players are generally fresher.
Historically the WC was always the stronger tournament and therefore rightly the pinnacle of a players career, but I think now the CL has overtaken it.
I read this argument on here last summer by TxB and it was the most hopeless argument I've ever read from a top poster who knows his stuff. It's complete and utter nonsense to suggest the Wc is inferior to the CL. Leaving aside the fact for a minute that the CL isn't even as good as the Copa Libertadores if world championship results are any guideline, the top four national teams in any WC would destroy any top four CL team. Spain, for the sake of argument, are Barca+ - therefore superior by definition. There's no other team in the world that could even mount a challenge to Brazil/Italy/Argentina/Spain.
It's the most spurious way of elevating Messi's stature.
I'm afraid there's no short cuts to football greatness, Bruce. Messi will just have to do it the hard way.
Barca are Spain, but with a better RB and the best player in the world added. You're mental, mate.
As for Argentina? Seriously? Madrid or Barca couldn't beat Argentina? Besides their strike force, they're not that special. Italy... Jesus Christ. Did you watch the last world cup? New Zealand drew with them... so then, are New Zealand better than Madrid, United, Chelsea...?
I like you DK, you often talk a lot of sense, but damn... in this case, you're beggaring belief.