Yes curtailment (rather than voiding although you seemed to indicate that anyway) looks to be the only correct option morally, but as Arminisgod has been posting it's not necessarily the option they'll take.
The tv rights (tbf Sky and BT would probably be accommodative and come to an arrangement - but overseas broadcasters won't) is really driving this and the huge financial sums involved, none bigger than the difference between being in the prem and not, would be a similar driving force for teams who may not have a chance of achieving something unless restarted. In this world unfortunately money and tbf real financial survival for some clubs, can become their only priority.
Lower down the leagues curtailment and deciding on points per game or any formula is a problem, so while no relegation for the prem is possible and maybe elsewhere, how would you even start to adjudicate on promotion from league one with such fine fractions separating teams?
Finding any fair solution (at least in the lower leagues) is impossible imo and court action from some chairman probable.
Any chairmen who in the midst of this worldwide pandemic and unprecedented national crisis, with leagues doing their utmost best but inevitably coming to imperfect solutions, who thinks adding a law suit to the mix for any perceived aggrievance, perhaps even stretching on for many months or even years, is the right thing to do only deserves contempt.
The chaiman of Utrecht in Holland has set such a disgraceful example, by challenging their league's decision to give the champions league places to their two joint leaders. Utrecht not even in the Europa places have brought a law suit which if successful would pay them far more than they could ever hope to gain from any potential Europa league campaign.
Unfortunately there would no doubt be similar altruistic and helpful souls here, always anxious to put their own aggrievances aside to help football through this crisis - sad but being sarcastic is the only way to put it kindly.
