Current Affairs Prince Andrew poor judge of character or what ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
LinekersLegs said:
Outrageous to not make clear the huge conflicts of interest


I know that TV claims to like people who are “subject matter experts” but I don’t think they needed to interview a lawyer who took his clothes off at an Epstein property for a massage to get an opinion on the case.
Click to expand...

I can't wait to see Dershowitz in the dock. A loathsome individual.
 
Tipp blue said:
One of the first signs of guilt is looking for a technicality to get off.
www.thejournal.ie

Prince Andrew’s lawyer argues accuser cannot sue in US as ‘she lives in Australia’

Virginia Giuffre claims she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein to have sex with Andrew when she was aged 17 and a minor under US law.
www.thejournal.ie www.thejournal.ie
Click to expand...
While I agree with the sentiment, it's also the first sign of a good defence barrister/attorney who'll try to stop a trial before it even beings for many reasons.
 
No doubt that she will top herself before she can start grassing the whole stinking rat's nest up, including prince sweatypalms, to the authorities - mad how these people can all manage to kill themselves in these maximum security prisons isn't it?

Think it's also time that the met police are retired as not fit for purpose - not doing anything about Andrew or the downing Street parties just shows how corrupt and bent the whole organisation is - same goes for the monarchy tbh.
 
Im not very well informed on this whole elite paedogeddon narrative but can someone explain what Prince Andrews is hiding from other than embarrassment ? From what ive read the girl he supposedly slept with was 17 and it happened when they were in London ? Meaning nothing illegal happened ? Or is it more that the trafficking was illegal and therefore the age is irrelevant in terms of him breaking the law ?
 
JimmyJeffers said:
He’s being protected by the Royal family. He could be ordered to answer questions by them or face being ostracised from the family. Neither will happen. I hope people remember this,
Click to expand...
In these times of austerity and hardship people aren’t as comfortable with the idea of the royal family and their vast wealth any more.

This situation has shown they are completely above the law and has accelerated the feeling of irrelevance and insignificance towards them. I find it’s generally the older generations who still hold any positive feelings towards them.
 
JimmyJeffers said:
He’s being protected by the Royal family. He could be ordered to answer questions by them or face being ostracised from the family. Neither will happen. I hope people remember this,
Click to expand...

Said this before but I really think the focus on him (Andrew) is solely so that the rest of Epstein’s circle can stay out of gaol.

I mean Epstein had closer links to loads of people at the top of the US (as his billions, his flight logs, social circle and mid-00s plea deal proved) but obviously if it’s all dependent on extraditing someone fundamentally irrelevant who will never be extradited then obviously justice can’t take place unfortunately, everyone will just have to ignore all those unopened cans of worms who are in the same jurisdiction.
 
Baines' left foot said:
In these times of austerity and hardship people aren’t as comfortable with the idea of the royal family and their vast wealth any more.

This situation has shown they are completely above the law and has accelerated the feeling of irrelevance and insignificance towards them. I find it’s generally the older generations who still hold any positive feelings towards them.
Click to expand...
You may be right. We do love to bootlick mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top