Interestingly, he didn’t actually post their attendances during that time. After 2 years, which could be attributed to a new stadium bounce, the average attendance was 42k. The next season it was 39k. Only when the big money came in and performances on the pitch improved did they start selling out regularly.This just isn't the case. To quote @joey_macmo on another thread:
"Man City finished 16th their first season in the new stadium yet experienced a 40% bump in attendances, their biggest signing was Claudio Reyna for £2.5m. They went 16th, 8th, 15th, 14th, 9th & 10th in their first 6 seasons in the new stadium, people seem to have got the timescale of events at Man City totally wrong.
So yes they are a perfectly good example to use, again especially when you consider that they've had to expand twice since moving (at a much higher cost than an initial build) due to their recent success."
Far more convincing points coming from those arguing that something in the 50s would be fine than those demanding at least 60k.