Milk
Udderly delicious
City bigwigs are confident they will never go before the beak.
And I don’t think they will. Rules will be altered “puff”
City bigwigs are confident they will never go before the beak.
And I don’t think they will. Rules will be altered “puff”
If say Forest get 6 points off, and we get another 2. I would back us to finish above them. And if we do, we almost certainly survive.
It would be the first time this season
Not sure how they have got to that but well hopefully they will get a shock
TmoMoney0721
Player Valuation: £750k
Where was he saying this at? Would like to check it out.
The binman chronicles
Player Valuation: £80m
Only up to eight by the seem of it. The good news is likely whatever happens Forest will drop by more than we will drop again and as we are ahead of them now it puts us into a good position to survive.
Sticks in the back of the throat that we (twice) and Forest will be the only teams to be given a points deduction under psr before they change the rules to make it harder to breach. Yet other clubs have committed fraud and are yet to be looked at. It's like the police dealing with a pair of shoplifters, trying to throw the book at them, whilst two murderers are on the rampage and there response is don't worry, we'll get to them after we've finished up prosecuting these.
bigstickytoffee
Player Valuation: £500k
Not if the team starts picking up points, beginning with Dyche coming up with some sort of attacking game plan.
We're in big trouble if not and the next 4 months are going to be truly awful.....
Baggzio
Player Valuation: £15m
This is the way I'm looking at it. We're currently 1 point ahead of Forest, no matter what our second charge is Forest's will be far worse. When you look at it really then it doesn't matter if we get 2, 4, 6 or 15, Forest's will likely be the maximum available punishment which will probably be 8 points. Even if we go back to where we were on -10 overall it'd have us on 21 points, but Forest on 16.
Ultimately there's no realistic situation here where things can get "worse" for us in terms of relegation. I strongly believe this is now a case of whether the PL will relegate Forest or Luton, because at the end of the day that's the only thing that'll change at the bottom.
jonnyg
Player Valuation: £2.5m
Can't resist that little dig in the second sentence
Saint Domingo
Player Valuation: £80m
We’d be getting an in season 8 point deduction for being charged twice for the same breach. They’d be charged once and then have their second charge next season. Would seem entirely unfair on us.
Spadge Vernacular
Player Valuation: £60m
So City are now nailed on to be relegated a couple of divisions then?
I don't like the way this, below, is worded. Hopefuly it is just something that could be interpreted in a number of ways but this quote could suggest that that anything over £105m results in a 6 point deduction. That would be grossly unfair if City got the same 6 point deduction as us but for being way above our breach. Same for Forest et al.
Everton points deduction appeal: Key questions answered as Premier League club's deduction reduced to six points
Everton were deducted 10 points on November 17 for a breach of the Premier Leagues Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR); the club appealed against the decision and a three-day hearing took place from January 31; on February 26, the deduction was reduced to six points
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
Yes, and add this to the wording that we “continue to co-operate” with the PL re the second charge, it does sound like we’re not necessarily headed to a hearing. If we were there would be nothing to cooperate about.
*fixed
Forest fans are in for a rude awakening. I went on one of their main forums. Most think they will only get 3-4 points max and they have mitigating factors in selling Johnson etc and Everton will definitely receive at least a further 6 points deduction.
Unless the judgement has changed the quantum then the precedent is 6 points just for the breach and the Johnson sale will not be considered as a mitigating factor as the IC essentially don't consider them based on the Everton case.
Forest will have 6 points deducted as an absolute minimum whereas Everton will be given a further 6 points as an absolute maximum.
Unless the judgement has changed the quantum then the precedent is 6 points just for the breach and the Johnson sale will not be considered as a mitigating factor as the IC essentially don't consider them based on the Everton case.
Forest will have 6 points deducted as an absolute minimum whereas Everton will be given a further 6 points as an absolute maximum.
