Owen or Saha

[Dixies60]

Who would you rather have at the club ?

 

[FC Brugge]

owen, i'm not a fan of saha and if i Had to choose between two strikers that cant stop being injured, might as well choose the one who at one point was a legend in l'pool

 

[toffeetower]

Saha based on his character and his desire to prove himself, he's really won me over.

Wouldn't mind both to be honest.

 

[stinger]

No brainer, clearly Saha is a better player. Probably cheaper too.

 

[Blue Wiz]

Both injuryprone, but Saha has proven himself to us while Owen hasn't.

Owen will also, with high probability, cost more in wages and perhaps even have a harder time to mesh into the team.

 

[Neiler]

Why choose when you can have both!

Owen for me, but Saha's play is easier on the eye.

 

[Nebbiolo]

I think Saha brings a bit more than Owen. Bearing in mind that we only want one injury-prone, reserve striker, Saha wins.

But I suppose now we're owned by Ahmed bin Saqr al-Qassimi, we can afford to chuck money around for a season or two (while we establish ourselves as top 3 material).

 

[Azzbot]

No brainer, clearly Saha is a better player. Probably cheaper too.

What he said

 

[Goat]

Both injury prone, both decent on their day, but clearly Saha, when he tries, is a better all round player.

 

[That Tim]

Saha bcause he is a better player now.

 

[best little spaniard]

Saha bcause he is a better player now.

Hear hear

case closed

 

[Welton Toffee]

Quite blatantly, King Louis.

 

[TX Bill]

Easy.

Saha.

 

[parkendmaster]

Saha.

 

[StDomingosGringo]

Saha, more aspects to his game.