- Status
Coffee and TV
Player Valuation: £25m
Chelsea have £1bn debt and they do alright
fixed for you Toffeewoman.
Toffeewoman
Player Valuation: £25k
Please correct me on this as talking off the top of my head, but my understanding was it's not how much, but the difference. So I think it was Bournemouth that was being done under that Financial Fair Play thing because the balance wasn't close enough between expenditure and income, or something! I'm not sure how this Rule is supposed to create a more level playing field.
Toffeewoman
Player Valuation: £25k
You're a gem!
Bluelad1878
Player Valuation: £500k
Yeah I know but the RS are the only ones who can spend
and that's why the RS haven't won the league for 27 years...thanks for clearing that up...
Toffeewoman
Player Valuation: £25k
I wish I was! I need direction and information on this one!
Oh no I meant just wait for bizzaro to teach all about ffp.
... Don't hold your breath. Or take anything he's says as true without outside corroboration.
Toffeewoman
Player Valuation: £25k
!
Sorry mate, I should really stop typing now. Missing the irony. Thanks for explaining to the wrecked! Will check it out but maybe not tonight.
Seathestars
Player Valuation: £60m
I hope so, or is it Koeman eve eve
Or Koeman eve eve eve
It's like someone keeps moving Christmas back a few days
Bluelad1878
Player Valuation: £500k
Just bitter kopites mate, just pipe them down.
bizzaro
LOVE GOT JUST THE WAY IT IS #ALWNV
FFP runs under defined time limits. You can make 45 million Euros worth of non-infrastructure spending related losses every three years which (Moshiri) can simply write off.
Chelsea's debt level prior to FFP is irrelevant.
It's designed to force clubs to develop their own revenues to fund their activities.
Not to rely on debt. Which was ultimately going to kill clubs. (Parma in Italy. Rangers in Scotland etc).
The issue may be for Bournemouth in the Championship's rules which are more strict than the Premier League or FFP.
- Status
