There's a huge potential problem for Newcastle's new owners - the majority one - Saudi sovereign wealth fund PIF and one of the minority ones Stavely led PCP capital who'll likely be running the club on a day to day basis.
FFP was invented to stop owners putting in millions of pounds into football, EUFA seem quite happy with owners taking millions out of the game but they've now erected huge barriers to prevent owners wanting to invest millions of their own money into their own club and hence into football.
Take millions out of football, UEFA's FFP says ok that's fine go right ahead and take as much as you want.
Put millions of your own money into football and UEFA's FFP say's NO WAY, not unless you do exactly what we say.
Man City found it hard enough despite breaking these ridiculous rules - UEFA never stop in their quest to protect their favoured elite.
I think viewing FFP through the lens of legislation that is to prevent the established order being broken up is a very good one worthwhile one. It's certainly been the consequence, where the changes have seen leagues become increasingly dominated by a small number of established teams. Whether that was an explicit, or implicit goal is open to interpretation but it would be hard to not see the fairly obvious consequence of it.
The noise around this deal is really problematic for them. Say what you want re Usmanov, but if he's invovled he's kept it on the downlow. I do wonder if the Saudi's wanted to do the same?
I think if most of the clubs looked back at City, the conclusion would have been, that you need to stop them early and hit them very hard/tie them with red tape and transfer bans. I see that being the position taken by clubs quite early on with Newcastle.
So even if, (which I find unlikely) they want to pump money in, it will be heavily scrutinised and made very difficult to do.