New Everton Stadium Discussion

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/business/inside-evertons-plan-finance-bramley-12834720

Inside Everton's plan to finance Bramley Moore Dock stadium
University expert says council is acting like a parent on a mortgage application

BYALISTAIR HOUGHTON
  • 05:00, 3 APR 2017
  • UPDATED07:35, 3 APR 2017
Everton FC and Liverpool council have come up with a “cunning scheme” that will keep the bankers happy while delivering a new stadium – says a university finance specialist.

Kieran Maguire, of the University of Liverpool’s Management School, says banks could “flatly refuse” to lend £300m to a football club, but would be likely to lend to a local authority.

And so, he says in his post on the university’s website, the council is acting like a parent guaranteeing their child’s mortgage application.

Mr Maguire, a lecturer in economics, finance and accounting, says that “in theory, everyone’s a winner” from this deal, though there are risks.

Everton Bramley Moore Dock stadium cash deal SEALED

maguire.jpg

University of Liverpool Management School lecturer Kieran Maguire
New Everton stadium - where is the money coming from?
Here’s a closer look at what he has to say...
Bank could ‘flatly refuse’ to help

Many people have asked why Everton, backed by billionaire Farhad Moshiri, can’t take out the loan itself. Mr Maguire spells out why.

He said: “Imagine you are a bank manager, and you receive the following loan application:

“Amount to be borrowed? Up to £300,000,000

“Purpose of loan? Sports stadium

“How often is asset used? 20-25 days a year

“Income of borrower: Operating losses of £114 million in last 10 years

“Key risks: Could be relegated and lose 70% of income. The most valuable asset apparently wants to depart the business.

“Would you lend to that business?

“The above scenario is that of Everton Football Club and the proposed new stadium at Bramley Moore dock.

“Under normal circumstances a bank would either flatly refuse to lend, or charge a prohibitive interest rate.

“So a cunning scheme is therefore required to keep the bankers happy.”

Everton's new Bramley Moore stadium - early plans for 50,000 seater ground

JS102294995.jpg

Everton football club major investor Farhad Moshiri and Bill Kenwright and Mayor of Liverpool Joe Anderson at Bramley Moore Dock on the waterfront for plans to provide Everton with a new stadium.
What is the cunning plan?
That plan, as revealed last month, will see the creation of a “Special Purpose Vehicle” that sits between Everton and its lender. Everton pays the SPV, then the SPV pays the lender – while taking an annual security fee of more than £4m that can be passed on to the council.

So why is the council getting involved?

JS108401003.jpg

Bramley Moore Dock (Photo: Colin Lane)
As Mr Maguire explains, “The council are seen by the financial markets as a lower lending risk than Everton, and so can borrow money at a lower interest rate. They can pass on these interest savings to Everton.

“What is being proposed is that the council therefore act as a guarantor for the monies required by Everton, in a similar way that parents might guarantee to a bank for a mortgage application in relation to their son/daughter.”

‘Everyone’s a winner’...

Mr Maguire says that should give Everton lower repayments and give the council money.

He adds: “In theory, everyone is a winner”.

Mr Maguire points out that Everton’s key revenue streams – season ticket sales, hospitality and naming rights – will be put into a separate bank account to minimise risk. The council gets first dibs on that money before the club, to ensure the loan gets paid.

What Blues fans think of Everton's Bramley Moore Dock stadium plans

JS107898085.jpg

Aerial view of Bramley-Moore Dock
Mr Maguire says: “This will minimise the risk to the council”.

...though there are risks

Mr Maguire says there are some “unknowns”

He says there is a risk of a budget overrun, as happened with the new Wembley, while steel costs could go up if the pound falls against the dollar.

The lecturer also says it is “not clear” yet how much Mr Moshiri himself would invest in the stadium project.

Another obvious risk is relegation – though Mr Maguire points out Everton’s proud record of top flight survival. If the worst did happen, the “parachute payments” Everton would receive would go into an account held by the council. That could be worth £50m in the first year.
 
So let me get this straight, a real 'koff proper billionaire is getting his 'baby billionaire' mate to make a shed load of money by building us a riverside stadium and drag our business practices/marketing etc into the 21st century and as a poor 2nd prize ( the razzle in my pocket as the 2nd prize - ian drury and the blockheads) have a good go / try to get us into the top 4
SHAME
ON
HIM.
SHAME I SAY.
He's not building Everton anything. He's organised the deal that sees him on the sidelines and Everton handcuffed to a 40 year lease.
 
Many people have asked why Everton, backed by billionaire Farhad Moshiri, can’t take out the loan itself. Mr Maguire spells out why.
He said: “Imagine you are a bank manager, and you receive the following loan application:
“Amount to be borrowed? Up to £300,000,000
“Purpose of loan? Sports stadium
“How often is asset used? 20-25 days a year
“Income of borrower: Operating losses of £114 million in last 10 years
“Key risks: Could be relegated and lose 70% of income. The most valuable asset apparently wants to depart the business.

Would you lend to that business?
Alternative conversation with the bank:

"How much you looking for?"

"£300M"

"How much are you worth?

"£2.2 billion"

"Sign here".
 

You are very naive. You think people like Moshiri/Usmanov 'give away £5M' every season?

But ok...

They do if it's tax deducable, which it probably is and thus essentially 'free money'.
Lays it out.
We get £5M - he pays £5M less tax.

But you knew that.

btw, not being well up on these interweb terms is what you do pop corning or plain wumming. Do you get some kick back per click off GOT.
You should be able to fund the stadium yourself soon
 
They do if it's tax deducable, which it probably is and thus essentially 'free money'.
Lays it out.
We get £5M - he pays £5M less tax.

But you knew that.

btw, not being well up on these interweb terms is what you do pop corning or plain wumming. Do you get some kick back per click off GOT.
You should be able to fund the stadium yourself soon

Sorry to be pedantic but if he takes a tax deduction of 5m then he saves 1m in corporate tax at the current rate of 20%.
 

The way I see it is this:

1) Stadium built with a track. This will need removable tiers which would be very expensive or leave us with a non-football stadium. Think this is the least favoured option. Think London Stadium.

2) Part-built stadium with a track will delay our build and impact on design most likely. We end up with a football stadium at the end of the process though. Think Etihad.

3) Track built on stilts. Cannot see how this is possible whatsoever in a stadium with stands built around the pitch, the track area is simply too big. For an idea transpose an athletics track onto the Emirates or something, there'd be about 10 rows above the pitch or something and the exits etc must be factored in. Think Hampden but in a proper shaped stadium.

4) Intelligent design. Of course it's possible to have both a track and an intimidating stadium close to the pitch.......if you pay for it. Think Qatar.

There's so many unknowns still we're all just guessing but unless we increase costs substantially it's probably a fair assumption that football design may have to suffer.

With regards to point three you are absolutely spot on.

The end to end distance of a standard 8 lane running track is 177 metre. That's not counting to gap then required between lane 8 and row 1.

To put it in to perspective Goodison is approx 170 metres from the back of the Gwladys to the the back of the Park End.
 

Top