BlueStevie35
Player Valuation: £70m
And you’re privy to this info how?People need to think hard about this: they're not here to spend money, they're here to take it.
And you’re privy to this info how?People need to think hard about this: they're not here to spend money, they're here to take it.
When they took over Roma they had a big team in a league that had potential to increase tv money, and had plans for a new stadium that would give them a boost to their financial health. The problem with getting plans for a stadium and getting it built means that new stadium is very far on the horizon and so too any boost to the clubs bank account that would help them invest on the field.As I've said all along: they have a very different agenda here to Roma.
You dont bleed your flagship company, you subsidise it if necessary.
They'll see a lot more headroom that can be moved into quickly at Roma. Everton is one of those investments that can generate cash to attract interest down the line.
TFG will see their Roma and Everton investments are on completely different tracks IMO.
Spaffed best part of a billion quid sorting our mess out but they're only here to fleece us.Not sure you’ve called this right @davek, looking at the relative leagues and their status, I think they stand to make a better return on any investment at Everton than they will at Roma.
For me, they have to make us competitive and relevant on the pitch before they can make any money back, so that means investment in a club and team that’s been on life support for years.
There is some truth in this, but they can only take money out of the club if it is making money, otherwise they are just taking back out what they have already put in. It's quite simply the whole point of investors, putting money into something so it is able to become more successful, more profitable and worth more money than you paid for it. People will point at the Glazers and their example of stripping ManUre of cash, which is true but ManUre where a cash cow when they took them over and still generate more money a year than most clubs, that model is simply not an option at Everton if they are going to get a return on their investment.People need to think hard about this: they're not here to spend money, they're here to take it.
I think he's mellowed a bit actually.Congratulations, davek is the first and hopefully only one in my ignore list. He is either clinically depressed or here to wind people up. I hope it's the latter in which case ignoring him is the right thing to do. He has 0 useful input in any thread here. He just invents stuff up that makes the club look as bad as possible. Latest messages are a case in point: he somehow knows what Friedkin's are planning to do with Everton and it's of course to bleed the club dry. Because I guess investors only buy companies to do that.
It's like coming up with the idea we are linked to some [Poor language removed] player for 30 million even though it has not been reported anywhere, not even the worst blarg sites and then getting upset about it and telling how stupid our transfer policy is.
And then repeating this day after day after day, many times every day.
Yes, but they have a quicker route to success via Roma.Not sure you’ve called this right @davek, looking at the relative leagues and their status, I think they stand to make a better return on any investment at Everton than they will at Roma.
For me, they have to make us competitive and relevant on the pitch before they can make any money back, so that means investment in a club and team that’s been on life support for years.
What money are they here to take, you silly sausage?
Yeah, because history tells us that owners of Everton should be trusted.Congratulations, davek is the first and hopefully only one in my ignore list. He is either clinically depressed or here to wind people up. I hope it's the latter in which case ignoring him is the right thing to do. He has 0 useful input in any thread here. He just invents stuff up that makes the club look as bad as possible. Latest messages are a case in point: he somehow knows what Friedkin's are planning to do with Everton and it's of course to bleed the club dry. Because I guess investors only buy companies to do that.
It's like coming up with the idea we are linked to some [Poor language removed] player for 30 million even though it has not been reported anywhere, not even the worst blarg sites and then getting upset about it and telling how stupid our transfer policy is.
And then repeating this day after day after day, many times every day.
Wait'll you see your season ticket prices in the coming years...and the price of all the gear and services they force on fans.
Wait'll you see your season ticket prices in the coming years...and the price of all the gear and services they force on fans.
...or taken in the best light - make it!People need to think hard about this: they're not here to spend money, they're here to take it.
I’m sure they’re fully aware of the investment opportunities around the new stadium, naming rights of said stadium and how television deals compare with the Italian leagues. I’d be surprised if they risk those investments by not putting money into the footballing side of things.As I've said all along: they have a very different agenda here to Roma.
You dont bleed your flagship company, you subsidise it if necessary.
They'll see a lot more headroom that can be moved into quickly at Roma. Everton is one of those investments that can generate cash to attract interest down the line.
TFG will see their Roma and Everton investments are on completely different tracks IMO.
Congratulations, davek is the first and hopefully only one in my ignore list. ….