good popcorning, cahill had his limitations for sure, he was a better footballer and athlete than naismith though, a better version in generalSo was Tim Cahill.
good popcorning, cahill had his limitations for sure, he was a better footballer and athlete than naismith though, a better version in generalSo was Tim Cahill.
If a Hull or Stoke were to enquire about this lad and offer around 2m, i'd snap their hands off. Surely there is better options in our youth than Naismith.
Last summer when we were all looking forward to the new season and were excited about the possibility of putting a good season together to push on and qualify for the CL, was Steven Naismith in your first team plans as a starter each week ?A lot of people on here are saying he's not good enough for a team with ambitions to finish in the top 4.Thats fair comment. Does that mean we can also say coleman baines Jagielka mirallas pienaar and barkley aren't good enough for the club . They've all got history of finishing outside the top 4
Getting 5m for such a limited player would be daylight robbery and would surpass the Fellaini transfer as being our best sell.we get 5 mill plus easy, one of the promoted teams maybe
But there all much more talented and all are better playersA lot of people on here are saying he's not good enough for a team with ambitions to finish in the top 4.Thats fair comment. Does that mean we can also say coleman baines Jagielka mirallas pienaar and barkley aren't good enough for the club . They've all got history of finishing outside the top 4
No mate but id certainly keep him.hes got limitations but he's a quality finisher. We haven't got many goalscorers at the club and they don't come cheapLast summer when we were all looking forward to the new season and were excited about the possibility of putting a good season together to push on and qualify for the CL, was Steven Naismith in your first team plans as a starter each week ?
If a Hull or Stoke were to enquire about this lad and offer around 2m, i'd snap their hands off. Surely there is better options in our youth than Naismith.
He scores the odd goal here and there but 'quality' is not something i would use. At finishing he is neither poor or quality. He is what you would expect a professional footballer playing in that position to be.No mate but id certainly keep him.hes got limitations but he's a quality finisher. We haven't got many goalscorers at the club and they don't come cheap
Agreed. We paid £5m for Kone, and Naismith is both younger and better than the camel jockey.we get 5 mill plus easy, one of the promoted teams maybe
And what is that? Third highest scorer at his club for two consecutive seasons?He scores the odd goal here and there but 'quality' is not something i would use. At finishing he is neither poor or quality. He is what you would expect a professional footballer playing in that position to be.
Don't know for sure but hasn't he got about 10 goals this season ? Thats more than barkley sterling coutinho or fabregas.I don't really understand how scoring goals can be brushed off as unimportantHe scores the odd goal here and there but 'quality' is not something i would use. At finishing he is neither poor or quality. He is what you would expect a professional footballer playing in that position to be.