Muslims Burn Poppies

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nordecke said:
lol your response to FACT is some jank ass web site?

Why dont you read the Quran, since you seam to want to defend it so much.
Click to expand...

This is the political correctness gone mad we have to deal with.

In the early 2000's Tony Blair's Labour government (under Jack Straw) - had a migration report that was "Redacted" (all the sensitive parts were removed before publication). Which stated what actual negatives this mass migration effect was having on UK communities.


Labour removed all traces of the original report. But a freedom of information request allowed journalists to get hold of the ORIGINAL reports pre-redactions.

This news was buried behind other bad news put out by Labour last year (2009).

Disgrace. And it's the "put your head in the sand" attitude that turns a blind eye that allows this sort of thing to happen.


THIS WAS THE SAME - LABOUR - THAT HAD AN OPPOSITION MP ARRESTED BY POLICE ON "NATIONAL SECURITY" GROUNDS - TRYING TO GET HOLD OF THE SAME REPORTS !!!!!!

****ing joke. They won't tell the truth. That's what makes people more angry.
 
Last edited:
Blue 1 said:
I have read the Qu'ran and there is no point taking quotes from it to illustrate spurious points without understanding the historical context.

For example, stuff like [SIZE=-1]Sura 8.12 "Remember thy lord has inspired the angels with the message. Give firmness to the believers and instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. Smite them above their necks and smite the fingertips of them" that is often cited by people making the same points as yourself neglect that Sura 8 - The Battle of Badr, is about an actual battle that took place. Mohammed and his followers were faced with a hostile army. They weren't just like, decending on places and forcing people to convert or die.

[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Sura 47.4 "When you encounter the unbelievers, Strike off their heads. Untill you have made a wide slaughter among them tie up the remaining captives."[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Sura 47 was revealed during the first year of Hijrah when the Muslims were under threat of extinction by invasion from Mecca.[/SIZE]

and so on.
Click to expand...

Oh since you put it like that, I guess I can agree, Islam IS peaceful..
 
The funny thing is is that you've just done exactly what I was on about.

I'm leaving it there though. I've got no real desire to argue with fellow blues about this stuff. It makes me feel sad.
 
Blue 1 said:
I have read the Qu'ran and there is no point taking quotes from it to illustrate spurious points without understanding the historical context.

For example, stuff like [SIZE=-1]Sura 8.12 "Remember thy lord has inspired the angels with the message. Give firmness to the believers and instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. Smite them above their necks and smite the fingertips of them" that is often cited by people making the same points as yourself neglect that Sura 8 - The Battle of Badr, is about an actual battle that took place. Mohammed and his followers were faced with a hostile army. They weren't just like, decending on places and forcing people to convert or die.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Sura 47.4 "When you encounter the unbelievers, Strike off their heads. Untill you have made a wide slaughter among them tie up the remaining captives."[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Sura 47 was revealed during the first year of Hijrah when the Muslims were under threat of extinction by invasion from Mecca.[/SIZE]

and so on.
Click to expand...

Yes they were.. Starting with Mohammed's own friggen Tribe, who laughed in his face when he tried to convert them ..
 
Blue 1 said:
I have read the Qu'ran and there is no point taking quotes from it to illustrate spurious points without understanding the historical context.

For example, stuff like [SIZE=-1]Sura 8.12 "Remember thy lord has inspired the angels with the message. Give firmness to the believers and instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. Smite them above their necks and smite the fingertips of them" that is often cited by people making the same points as yourself neglect that Sura 8 - The Battle of Badr, is about an actual battle that took place. Mohammed and his followers were faced with a hostile army. They weren't just like, decending on places and forcing people to convert or die.

[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Sura 47.4 "When you encounter the unbelievers, Strike off their heads. Untill you have made a wide slaughter among them tie up the remaining captives."[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Sura 47 was revealed during the first year of Hijrah when the Muslims were under threat of extinction by invasion from Mecca.[/SIZE]

and so on.
Click to expand...

Tell your points to this guy.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Pearl
 
deathbyropeandglass said:
Links and proof please. You've been given them and refuted them, please allow me to do the same.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

The Home Office report "Research, Development And Statistics Occasional Paper No 67 - Migration: An Economic And Social Analysis", which was published in January 2001


Ex- LABOUR - Government advisor Andrew Neather says there was a 'driving political purpose' behind it. This was kept secret at the time.

Who wrote speeches relative to the subject matter above ADMITTED THE LABOUR PARTY - DELIBERATELY mislead the British public and redacted all of the negative subject matter out.

Including rises in crime due to mass immigration. Rises in terrorism. etc.

Not only that Andrew Neather - says that the Labour party deliberately encouraged immigration. this TO MANIPULATE FUTURE ELECTION RESULTS.

Their polite term was "the Government’s intention was to encourage mass immigration for ’social objectives’ "

Doing so against the electorate's wishes. Not for the first time.
 
Last edited:
Blue 1 said:
Some of these guys home addresses have been leaked by the S** newspaper and EEEDL Leader Tommy Robinson/Stephen Yaxley Lennon. The EEEDL response can be seen here. Some of it's pretty disturbing:

http://pressnotsorry.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/incitement-from-the-sun-reaction-from-the-edl/
Click to expand...

Yeah look at the facebook comments, racists who are jumping on the EDL bandwagon. Then look down and read what someone called Jennifer Cleary has written. PRetty much sums up what the EDL SHOULD be about.
 
Reidy's Bottle Of Grecian said:
What these extremists need is a feck'n good kickin' from within their own society, it's all good and well them saying they are prepared to die for their cause, but they wouldn't like to sit in pain from a good shoein' for a week.

Chinese burns, dead arms, winkle picker up the hoop and the humiliation of losing their eyebrows would make them think not twice but thrice before they did it again.
Click to expand...

Write your own jokes for that one. Oops
 
Matt Damon said:
The Home Office report "Research, Development And Statistics Occasional Paper No 67 - Migration: An Economic And Social Analysis", which was published in January 2001


Ex- LABOUR - Government advisor Andrew Neather says there was a 'driving political purpose' behind it. This was kept secret at the time.

Who wrote speeches relative to the subject matter above ADMITTED THE LABOUR PARTY - DELIBERATELY mislead the British public and redacted all of the negative subject matter out.

Including rises in crime due to mass immigration. Rises in terrorism. etc.

Not only that Andrew Neather - says that the Labour party deliberately encouraged immigration. this TO MANIPULATE FUTURE ELECTION RESULTS.

Their polite term was "the Government’s intention was to encourage mass immigration for ’social objectives’ "

Doing so against the electorate's wishes. Not for the first time.
Click to expand...

No sorry I think you misunderstood me.

I asked for links giving proof that in 2010, Mohammed and variations of was a more popular name in England (or the UK) than Oliver and variations of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top