OK... let's deal with this b/s.
1. No, you actually didn't and you actually failed to acknowledge which team had finished above the other the most in the last four seasons. Blinkered.
2. No, you said "play with". And I didn't say Portugal's "greatest midfielder" so stop with the b/s of putting words in my mouth.
3. Really. You think that. Look at the league table and the financial charts I gave a link to. Naturally, you're going back in history but it counts for diddly squat right now.
4. In your desperation to be right you are just repeating point 1. Fact is our recent record is pathetic and we have been surpassed by a team playing the Championship 5 years ago, Hard to take? That's the reality.
And none of the above gives me any pleasure to write but it's the reality. We have not even stagnated. We have gone so far backwards that other clubs are also passing us by.
1) I have acknowledge Wolves finished above us 3 out of 4 seasons. What I've also said is that it's an arbitrary deadline and an odd number. Like weve finished above each other once each in the last 2 years. We've finished above them more in the last 10 years. It feels like you are cherry picking a number to suit an argument.
But either way, it has no relevance to Wolves going backwards. 13th/10th is going backwards compared to 7th. What they do relative to Everton doesnt change that.
2) I'm not going to look back, but pretty sure the context is that he would be playing for one of the best midfielders in PL history. That clearly holds some sway for a player, or at least could hold some sway for a player, couldn't it?
Getting to play for say Gerrard, Rooney, Viera, Lampard etc does give those clubs a bit of a potential advantage.
As for putting words in your mouth, I'm trying not too, I'm trying to interpret your words. You mentioned about the alternative for MGW was playing for a great Portuguese midfielder. I'm not sure who you meant.
3) I dont think anything, I just observe the reality. Everton have bigger financial turnover then Wolves and have done every season for decades. Theres no think about it.
And yes I can read a league table, but I also know that basing club size on a singular league table doesnt make sense. It would make Manchester City the biggest team in the PL by some distance. But football is not just about the last year, or the last 4 or 5 years. Of course this counts for something. Not an enormous amount, but something.
4) I dont have any desperation to be right mate. I'm not even sure (barring the occasional factual mistake you've made) there is "right" or "wrong". People have different opinions.
The club in a broad sense has been in 20 years of stagnation. We had an anomalous season, where we fell substantially below our range of performance.
None of this mean Wolves have overtaken us in any meaningful sense. I asked you earlier, if team A has 96 points over 2 seasons and Team B has 98 points over 2 seasons, which team has overtaken the other? I'd be wanting clearer evidence in terms of what being over taken means.
I'm still awaiting how you think having an opinion on a football forum causes a football club to underperform? As opposed to say the execs not doing their jobs well enough. I'd be interested in the rationale for that.