Kurt.
Player Valuation: £100m
That means absolutely nothing .... Garry Glitter used to wear.....The fella wore as much leather as an F1 enthusiast.
Which tells me all I need to know.
Oh.

That means absolutely nothing .... Garry Glitter used to wear.....The fella wore as much leather as an F1 enthusiast.
Which tells me all I need to know.
He may have used his willy.....Who's Nilly?
Did Jacko bum him too?
Jacko had it according to the poster......I didn't know you could get noncing insurance. Every day's a learning day, eh?
All football players hold hands with the ball boys walking out too. Whatever other evidence there is I'm not sure this qualifies.
Although if Michael Keane started taking a ball boy on the pre season tour to share his bed I'd probably be asking a few questions.
The Birmingham 6 were proven guilty in a court of law.Yeah 1 sided, an account of what happened from one side of the story. He was also proven not guilty in a court, where that one side gave a testimony under oath to say he was innocent.
They could’ve quite easily added accounts to the documentary from both Culkin and the other lad who testified for MJs innocence.
They also didn’t go in depth into reported stories that both the lads are in it for money.
I’m not saying he’s innocent at all as he was a proper weirdo with children, it’s all just a bit dodgy (especially the Wade side of it). The guy who produced the movie has even admitted that all his evidence is circumstantial.
www.forbes.com
I think you've answered your own question.

I just don’t buy the argument that Jackson’s defenders believe in the sanctity of court decisions more than anyone else or that they are supporting him against mob rule.
There was no similar support for Saville and there isn’t for R Kelly. You could even use Shamima Begum as an example. None of these people have been found guilty of anything in court but none have the same level of support as Michael Jackson.
What is your reason for defending him and not the others? If it’s that he wrote some good songs with a decent beat that’s fine but it must come with an acceptance that you are overlooking, at best, some pretty suspect behaviour.
I’ll still listen to his music though. Not even arsed, he gets the ‘Pete Townsend’ pass from me lol
Because for the other 2, theres no clear financial motive, and no evidence pointing to the contrary mate. I'm not over looking anything, in fact it's the opposite - it's his detractors who are doing just that. With Jackson, there was a massive, multi-million dollar investigation by the FBI, they found nothing. People watch the documentary and assume they are telling the truth because it's bad, without knowing any kind of back story or counter argument because that's the entire point of it - it's a hatchet job aimed at causing a siege mentality.
R Kelly literally recorded himself noncing and keeps women and girls hostage. Saville was an open secret at the BBC for decades and everyone knew, yet literally hundreds closest to Jackson including other kids defend him.
Like you say, its mob rule.
Same with MJ
Do you have any links to that mate? can't find anything myself. All I can find is tabloid gossip regarding the 2 in the documentary.