Michael Jackson

Status
Not open for further replies.

Joey66 said:
He's a nonce on halloween night he put the willies up them....
Not on the EU thread sick of hearing about it , and its dominated by remoaners lol
have you looked at my jokes on the joes thread at least two good uns on there....
as for MJ taping the documentaries
- also my book has been ordered on Jezza the investigative writer you recommended its on its way along with 4 old EFC books ....
A bit upset as one of the guys on the old pictures thread is in Whiston Hospital not well by all accounts.....

I expect jacko to be found guilty now he has died .... the usual thing like JS......
Too early for the Frogs and my new net will stop them getting in randy sods......;)
Click to expand...
Jeez joey.

That was a real roller-coaster of a read
 

I don't know for sure, like everyone else, whether he was or not (my personal belief is he was), but I do know that I'm always deeply uncomfortably with public lynch mobs not following the rule of law.

For that reason, this documentary shouldn't exist. It puts undue stress on the family of a dead man with no legal recourse. It could be all true and a brilliant award-winning documentary, or it could have as much fact as that Simpsons episode where Homer grabs the jelly baby off the babysitters' arse - either way it shouldn't exist.

Similarly, R. Kelly may be guilty (my personal belief on that one is he absolutely is), but again I'm very, very uncomfortable with this 24 hour news cycle, Twitter lynching before it saw a day in court. How do you not pollute a jury pool the way things are?
 
I can't get my head round him being black American looking when he was a kid to a pale skinned in his 30's...
 

Does anyone else think it's outright disgusting that little kids as young as 5 were doing pelvic thrusts in front of thousands of people and being cheered to the rafters? It's so inappropriate.
 
Last edited:
Tubey said:
I don't know for sure, like everyone else, whether he was or not (my personal belief is he was), but I do know that I'm always deeply uncomfortably with public lynch mobs not following the rule of law.

For that reason, this documentary shouldn't exist. It puts undue stress on the family of a dead man with no legal recourse. It could be all true and a brilliant award-winning documentary, or it could have as much fact as that Simpsons episode where Homer grabs the jelly baby off the babysitters' arse - either way it shouldn't exist.

Similarly, R. Kelly may be guilty (my personal belief on that one is he absolutely is), but again I'm very, very uncomfortable with this 24 hour news cycle, Twitter lynching before it saw a day in court. How do you not pollute a jury pool the way things are?
Click to expand...
I sort of know what you mean but in these two cases the waters are already so muddied it’s almost like the horse has already bolted. There have been court cases already against both of them that have had pretty sketchy outcomes. One of the guys (Wade Robson) in this latest doc pressed charges in 2015 but the statute of limitations had run out. So what is he supposed to do if he really was abused over a 7 year period? Just sit there and get treated like a liar looking for money or get his story out there. If it is true it may help other potential victims to seek help and try to come to terms with what happened to them.

In the case of R Kelly it seems like he is still active and court cases haven’t worked despite what sounds like very clear evidence. But the documentary has shed light on what a terrible human being he is and will hopefully lead to some justice finally.
 
Seems Michael should of got himself a GOT account to counteract the boredom of having no friends...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top