Current Affairs Met Police

Status
Not open for further replies.
Told lies about smelling cannabis on black couple in car somehow, were dismissed from their jobs in the pigs, now reinstated and given back pay.


Institutionally what?
Just seen that and was about to post it….. very disappointing.

Also the reporting suggests, or at least a reader can conclude, that it was believed that they could smell cannabis in the car, which for two professional athletes is a very serious suggestion.

It did smack of double standards at the time mind, imagine how many other black drivers get the old ‘I can smell cannabis’ as an excuse to go over board but as they aren’t famous they don’t have a voice and its treated as completely normal.
 
Just seen that and was about to post it….. very disappointing.

Also the reporting suggests, or at least a reader can conclude, that it was believed that they could smell cannabis in the car, which for two professional athletes is a very serious suggestion.

It did smack of double standards at the time mind, imagine how many other black drivers get the old ‘I can smell cannabis’ as an excuse to go over board but as they aren’t famous they don’t have a voice and its treated as completely normal.
Thankfully it seems the couple are going to pursue the matter in civil court. So hopefully they can rip the back out of all 5 pigs pensions. I'd bring a charge against the force and thereby the chief of the met for institutionalised racism as well. Nothing like bad headlines to keep the nazi scum on the backfoot, especially when chris kaba's murderer walks away scott free.
 
Reinstated by whom? Because it wasn't the Met, I can tell you that for certain.
From the article:

"The dismissed PCs were "dedicated, hard-working and much respected officers" whose reputations had been "ruined" by the original findings, Appeals Tribunal chairman Damien Moore said.

"Both officers did not lie. Both officers will now be reinstated to the Met Police. They should receive back-pay," he said."
 
From the article:

"The dismissed PCs were "dedicated, hard-working and much respected officers" whose reputations had been "ruined" by the original findings, Appeals Tribunal chairman Damien Moore said.

"Both officers did not lie. Both officers will now be reinstated to the Met Police. They should receive back-pay," he said."

That’s pretty damming from the appeals tribunal tbh.

That’s legal speak for them
being stitched up by their own side.

The two athletes, were pretty placid with their comments after the appeal too, which suggests that they knew that something wasn’t right about it too.

This has more to run I feel.
 
Who on earth put him those roles and what have they got to say for themselves?
Absolute horror of the first order.
7 year suspension, fully paid whilst under investigation.

Same with the scum that killed Ian Tomlinson (the pig told three different sets of lies), he'll have threatened to spill the beans about the crimes of his fellow officers if they came after him. Stick him on suspension until the story goes cold then brush him under the carpet.

What boys club, what institutional corruption.

More subhuman inbred pig filth scum.



policing by consent some argue. Shambles!
 
From the article:

"The dismissed PCs were "dedicated, hard-working and much respected officers" whose reputations had been "ruined" by the original findings, Appeals Tribunal chairman Damien Moore said.

"Both officers did not lie. Both officers will now be reinstated to the Met Police. They should receive back-pay," he said."
I get that. My point was that I suspect it was inferred that Met, who have been labelled institutionally racist, made the decision because of the relative clause.

Instead, it was a tribunal made up of a lawyer, a senior officer and a lay person, so two of the three are impartial from the police, yet they found it unsafe.

I don't know the particulars of the case, but the snippets that have been said on the grapevine have pointed toward something far more untoward.

Anyone remember when José Baxter was stopped? There was no suggestion that he was using drugs, but it didn't stop people associated to him doing so.

There was intelligence to suggest in his case that drug use may have taken place; the odour of cannabis can last quite a while.
 
I get that. My point was that I suspect it was inferred that Met, who have been labelled institutionally racist, made the decision because of the relative clause.

Instead, it was a tribunal made up of a lawyer, a senior officer and a lay person, so two of the three are impartial from the police, yet they found it unsafe.

I don't know the particulars of the case, but the snippets that have been said on the grapevine have pointed toward something far more untoward.

Anyone remember when José Baxter was stopped? There was no suggestion that he was using drugs, but it didn't stop people associated to him doing so.

There was intelligence to suggest in his case that drug use may have taken place; the odour of cannabis can last quite a while.
If you are sat in a car, how can you smell anything in another car?


Need an arrest? Find someone with black skin. Job done.
 
If you are sat in a car, how can you smell anything in another car?


Need an arrest? Find someone with black skin. Job

I smell Skunk every day when I’m driving the kids to and from school.

Winter - Van drives past in the morning, smell of skunk wafts through the vents in my car.

Summer - Car full of young lads drives past, smell of skunk wafts in through the open window.

Have you never had a car drive past you and then seconds later you get a blast of skunk either through the vents or an open window !
 
I smell Skunk every day when I’m driving the kids to and from school.

Winter - Van drives past in the morning, smell of skunk wafts through the vents in my car.

Summer - Car full of young lads drives past, smell of skunk wafts in through the open window.

Have you never had a car drive past you and then seconds later you get a blast of skunk either through the vents or an open window !
Tommye to one side.

How can you be sure, unless it's the only person on the street or the only car on the road. It's the old reliable "we've had a description of an offender and you match that description" bullspit. It's the exact same issue as with child Q. Someone smelt ganja, get your clothes off in this room full of officers.

It's time to call scum out as scum. There is no policing with consent, the only thing a bully respects is force. It's time a few pigs faced the violence and death they so readily dole out.

Institutionally not fit for purpose. End the met, end the crime.
 
I smell Skunk every day when I’m driving the kids to and from school.

Winter - Van drives past in the morning, smell of skunk wafts through the vents in my car.

Summer - Car full of young lads drives past, smell of skunk wafts in through the open window.

Have you never had a car drive past you and then seconds later you get a blast of skunk either through the vents or an open window !
This happens, but "smelling cannabis" is the oldest, most clichéd load of old bollocks the filth use to justify stop and search.

Everywhere smells of weed these days.
 
This happens, but "smelling cannabis" is the oldest, most clichéd load of old bollocks the filth use to justify stop and search.

Everywhere smells of weed these days.
Firstly, requesting a car to stop is covered under the RTA 1988, and there is no requirement for circs - any constable can request any car to stop, carte blanche.

They can request any driver of a motor vehicle to provide their driving licence, home address and proof of insurance, too. This is all well documented.

If they've felt the vehicle was driving in a manner that may have suggested they were possibly impaired, and then there was a smell of cannabis, they can do a test.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top