So how exactly are teams supposed to compete? Cheat FFP? Well that's Chelsea and City out for the count. Spend to much for a couple of years? err goodbye Liverpool. Not earn enough income whilst making continuous smallish losses? Oops that'll be Everton then.
Buying young players and taking a chance is obviously a cheaper risk. Nothing wrong with that and allows the selling club to receive an income. Limiting squads to 25 players stops the big teams from abusing the opportunity that large income streams can offer them to dominate withoutrestraint. So if City and Chelsea have Moses, Lukaku and Barry sat doing nothing then that's apparently ok now.
The players get to play. The parent club gets to save money and thw loaning club gets to avoid a transfer fee. That's just smart financial management of spare resources. What Samuel conveniently overlooks is that the transfer fee - sorry that's the so-called transfer fee is really only a form of compensation to the club releasing the member of staff from a contract. Unless of course he actually thinks the clubs are selling human beings into slavery.
Buying young players and taking a chance is obviously a cheaper risk. Nothing wrong with that and allows the selling club to receive an income. Limiting squads to 25 players stops the big teams from abusing the opportunity that large income streams can offer them to dominate withoutrestraint. So if City and Chelsea have Moses, Lukaku and Barry sat doing nothing then that's apparently ok now.
The players get to play. The parent club gets to save money and thw loaning club gets to avoid a transfer fee. That's just smart financial management of spare resources. What Samuel conveniently overlooks is that the transfer fee - sorry that's the so-called transfer fee is really only a form of compensation to the club releasing the member of staff from a contract. Unless of course he actually thinks the clubs are selling human beings into slavery.