They were all poor.
Digne has been brilliant, he was dreadful the other day.
Lookman has been on good form from the bench. He was pretty useless the other day. Gomes is great, but even he couldn't find a pinpoint pass. It happens.
Lookman has never once played as a central striker so I don't know why this is suddenly an idea for a game against a Rafael Benitez side that just kicked lumps out of us? Maybe he could do a job but starting there?
I get the point that he would be a threat centrally and I do prefer him left with more licence to drift in, which is why I say maybe he isn't the answer instead of Walcott? Maybe it has to be him alternative with Bernard for now.
Silva's system relies on Richarlison - or that type of player (which for now, we only have Rico) to play as a striker. They have strength, height, athleticism and skill. It gives us a load of options.
Had Rico started centrally the other day, I'd wager Lookman would have had more joy because there'd be more space for him to move into.
At a real difficult point in the road in all this transitioning stuff.
Instead of decent mid table sides going toe to toe its more like they'll play the deep counter - unless we score first.
We can probably only rely on the top 6 to go at us, which means fewer games to play to our strengths.
(Watford at home probably being an exception given the circumstances)
Are we going to start being a better away side than at home?
So its a real challenge for Silva. How much does he change/tweak from his favoured approach?
And how much will this unsettle the project?
On Digne I think your being harsh. What was being expected of him was ridiculous.
The space for Newcastle to counter was on the left in behind him.
He was busting his guts up and down the pitch.
He was expected to do all things in attack, be Lookman on the left one moment, then Coleman, then Gomes.
Run back in defence, come back and get on the end of a poor overlapping pass. There was one pass from Bernard near the end that bordered on the obscene.
In the second half the left couldn't get into a rhythm of good combination play in all that space because they were getting purposefully fouled. Its a snide, effective tactic use to advantage in the lateral space which if it had been vertical would have probably been reds.
So kicked, run into the ground, poor support around him and losing the ball not really an option.
He was rendered to playing to Gomes or crossing.
And while he's getting criticism for his crosses, the movement/set up to receive them was much worse, clueless at times.
It looked like he actually sent in a cross as a message, just telling em what should be going on...then followed it up with a stinker himself.
The way they were set up they would've been lucky to score 1 in 50.
If your sending in that many crosses you have to use the near and far posts, go less direct, start to open them up.
There were a few poor ones but overall he's only as good as the movement in front of him.
The same can be said for Lookman and Gomes play.
On Richarlison, you say Silva relies on his strength and skill.
But does he really have the strength of an athletic CF in this league.
He's getting pushed off or going to ground with contact from defenders.
At first I was applauding the snide in him to get free kicks.
But the amount of times he's going down when a pass would have been a far far better option is being racked up.
Keeping the ball alive has been critical, such wasted opportunities.
Their a skill in this too, often overlooked. He's going to need to find this and harden up if its onwards an upwards.
A well timed reaction from d support might help things along.
He's no doubt a good player but he's a bit lost at the moment, partly because he's needs to start adapting and answering questions he probably hasn't had to before.
Difficult times ahead for Silva and the lads. COYB!