deipnosophist
Player Valuation: £80m
Nah waste of time.
Btw, I personally think 50 million is pretty meaningful tbh.
it buys some serious bunga bunga at Sepp's pad

Nah waste of time.
Btw, I personally think 50 million is pretty meaningful tbh.
They weren't banned as a result of an overspend, they were banned for failing to repay their debts to other clubs, the tax man and employees. Totally different scenario.There is a precedent though - they banned Malaga, Rayo and some other clubs from European competition this season because of financial issues.
They weren't banned as a result of an overspend, they were banned for failing to repay their debts to other clubs, the tax man and employees. Totally different scenario.
The ban is nothing to do with gaining advantage from financial doping, it's a direct result of unpaid bills to former employees and other clubs. They had a domestic transfer ban in Spain as a result of the same issue. It's not a precedent for a club like us to use against UEFA's chosen punishment for City, simple as.Its not totally different - they breached FIFA rules on financial conduct and gained an unfair advantage as a result, just as City and PSG have. The punishment should be the same.
The difference is they were not paying because they didn't have the money and that rule is therefore to avoid possibly lessening the 'integrity' of the competition if they went bankrupt.Its not totally different - they breached FIFA rules on financial conduct and gained an unfair advantage as a result, just as City and PSG have. The punishment should be the same.
We are everton. We earn our success on the football field, not the oil field or the field of law. Also, why do we act as sheep and call the European championship the "champions league" when clearly the competition is populated by runners up, not champions? It's time fans started taking control back of the beautiful game.
That is exactly the reason why we have to press the issue. Citeh will be appealing, so its benefits everyone to have both appeals of this case tried together. At worst UEFA is obliged to fight on our side.No need for us to do any legal challenge. In the highly unlikely event this escalates far enough that they'd get banned from the CL I'd obviously happily have us take their spot.
I read today the 50m fine might also go on their books. Like they've spent another 50m on players/wages which they'd have to also offset ... making things even harder for them. Not sure if true ... as with a lot of FFP stuff it's hard to know what's real.
But my point was why do we simply allow these bits of cultural folk-law and identity to be stolen from us? The name "Champions League" is misleading to say the least, and the EU hate all things to do with misleading advertising - eg it's Cornish "style" pasties, unless they're from Cornwall.Because that's the name of the competition?
Yarp -
But my point was why do we simply allow these bits of cultural folk-law and identity to be stolen from us? The name "Champions League" is misleading to say the least, and the EU hate all things to do with misleading advertising - eg it's Cornish "style" pasties, unless they're from Cornwall.
I still think of the PL as the "First Division" and still refer to it as such, because despite the sponsorship money, nobody ever paid me to change my language! This is one area where I admired the newcastle fans - just like we would, I hope, if they tried to rename Goodison Park, they rightly made a right fuss at the loss of the name "St James' Park."
A rose by any other name is still a rose.