dead_soft
Player Valuation: £35m
Wage caps can be got around in no time at all by creative accountancy, nefarious payments to wives, private school fees, etc etc etc.
I was only joking. I am very against any idea of a wage cap

Wage caps can be got around in no time at all by creative accountancy, nefarious payments to wives, private school fees, etc etc etc.
Someone with a similar strike rate over the past 48 league games.If we do sell him, who would you want us to bring in? (realistically)
Not sure who else would be interested in him but I wouldn't mind Batshuayi. We got linked with him in the past and he's already scored 8 goals in 10 games in Ligue 1 this season.If we do sell him, who would you want us to bring in? (realistically)
£35m I'd bite anyone's hand off, his first touch and link play are Sunderland standard.
We paid absolute top dollar for him.
charlie austin would never be called lazyIf we get rid of those 20 goals a season, we can afford with the money but can't attract similar. So we'll end up paying £20m for the likes of Charlie Austin to get us 10 goals while being called lazy because he's getting no service
Then you'll see what 'Sunderland standard' is all about...
charlie austin would never be called lazy
It's a headline without quotes or any justification of the fee. Nothing of substanceEverton have put a £45million price tag on Romelu Lukaku in an attempt to ward off potential buyers next summer.
They signed the Belgium striker from Chelsea for £28m in 2014 and the 22-year-old has enhanced his reputation with 44 goals for the club, including 16 while on loan at Goodison Park during the 2013-14 season.
Paris Saint-Germain and Juventus are believed to be interested. Lukaku is happy at Everton, but is likely to review his future at the end of the season.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...nsider-summer-form-striker.html#ixzz3qfIL2sOj
As long as he is playing well we'll get articles like this all the way through to the EurosIt's a headline without quotes or any justification of the fee. Nothing of substance
has Roberto come out and said he is not for sale as he did with Stones?
It's a headline without quotes or any justification of the fee. Nothing of substance
If we do sell him, who would you want us to bring in? (realistically)