Keith Harris article

Status
Not open for further replies.

No, Chelsea has also had scorn poured on them, Roman is gonna leave them soon, what about all that debt?

Basically, your stuck with Kenwrong lad, so just bend over for Uncle Bill.
 
No, Chelsea has also had scorn poured on them, Roman is gonna leave them soon, what about all that debt?

Basically, your stuck with Kenwrong lad, so just bend over for Uncle Bill.

You lad, your king of the planks. You love Moyes, yet hate Kenwright, but you don't understand that without Kenwright, there is no Moyes, and without Moyes there is no Kenwright.
 

You lad, your king of the planks. You love Moyes, yet hate Kenwright, but you don't understand that without Kenwright, there is no Moyes, and without Moyes there is no Kenwright.

Johnny likes Moyes. Moyes likes Kenwright. Therefore Johnny likes Kenwright.
 

Agreed, the massive tit doesn't deserve it either mate.

If he came up with some sensible solutions instead of throwing rocks, he wouldn't get so much abuse. Its not just because of his negativity, its also because, unless prompted by KEIOC, he doesn't have an answer to call his own.

Apart from that, he seems to be one of the few on this forum who understands where I am coming from in controversial issues e.g. a certain building in NY. So, I'll try and not be too hard, or else I'll be writing out personal apologies like some others.
 
Disagreeing on something does not necessarily comes with abuse. There are many ways to justify your opinion instead of throwing abuse. To be fair, Davek conduct himself well with dignity and didn't go down the road of returning "favour".
 
If he came up with some sensible solutions instead of throwing rocks, he wouldn't get so much abuse. Its not just because of his negativity, its also because, unless prompted by KEIOC, he doesn't have an answer to call his own.

Apart from that, he seems to be one of the few on this forum who understands where I am coming from in controversial issues e.g. a certain building in NY. So, I'll try and not be too hard, or else I'll be writing out personal apologies like some others.

It's a message board. We're going to agree with others on some issues and disagree on others. It's healthy. As long as we don't attack people personally, it's what makes reading these things worthwhile.
 
It's a message board. We're going to agree with others on some issues and disagree on others. It's healthy. As long as we don't attack people personally, it's what makes reading these things worthwhile.

I don't "attack" him. I do ask him direct questions. Its a message board. He has every right to dodge the question as he constantly does. He doesn't have to answer, but with each none answer lessons his arguments. I have a right to point that out.

If you really want people to agree with you, especially on this forum, especially as your talking about removing a chairman, just throwing stones is so bluekipper. We can do better than that.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top