Current Affairs Jordan Peterson

[Marius57]

Duh! I posted a video the day before you asked your question. Do keep up Lazy-Lob.
The sex-offender took part in a childrens drag story time, but wait a minute i hear you say - aren`t parents stopped from taking pictures at their kids school plays in case the footage is used for nefarious purposes yet this convicted sex offender is invited to read to little children, i`m confused!

I'm still waiting for you to explain how it is xxx rated......

You did post a video, (not of dqsh mind, of an independent organsier that failed to carry out checks properly). You realise that sex offenders (known or unknown) can apply for any jobs right? And its down to the employers to do the checks. But that sex offenders also come from every walk of life, not just drag Queens or men who wear dresses.

 

[trueblue84]

So my takeaway from that is Jordan Peterson is comfortable with the definition of the word "in" but thinks all other words require elaboration.

I've said before, I don't mind him when he's talking about his area of expertise and with a reasoned counterpoint to his ramblings, but my god, he chats utter wham when he strays into other subjects.

 

[Amw79]

So my takeaway from that is Jordan Peterson is comfortable with the definition of the word "in" but thinks all other words require elaboration.

I've said before, I don't mind him when he's talking about his area of expertise and with a reasoned counterpoint to his ramblings, but my god, he chats utter wham when he strays into other subjects.

My main problem with that, is it’s just an obviously disingenuous answer, seemingly to avoid committing himself to a religious belief.

Once you’ve gone down the Bill Clinton road of “It depends on what your definition of the word is, is”, you’re starting to look like a slippery S of a B.

 

[Walken]

So my takeaway from that is Jordan Peterson is comfortable with the definition of the word "in" but thinks all other words require elaboration.

I've said before, I don't mind him when he's talking about his area of expertise and with a reasoned counterpoint to his ramblings, but my god, he chats utter wham when he strays into other subjects.

Seriously, I've seen him complain loads about what he views as reductionist thinking, then this is the answer he gives to one of his own statements???!!! I genuinely think he might not understand any of the words he uses

 

[JimmyJeffers]

I genuinely think he might not understand any of the words he uses

He definitely doesn’t. He’s catnip for angry men.

 

[tsubaki]

He definitely doesn’t. He’s catnip for angry men.

angry, lazy men

 

[Yarrgh]

angry, lazy men

Not all of us! Grrr.

 

[Oddball]

I'm still waiting for you to explain how it is xxx rated......

You did post a video, (not of dqsh mind, of an independent organsier that failed to carry out checks properly). You realise that sex offenders (known or unknown) can apply for any jobs right? And its down to the employers to do the checks. But that sex offenders also come from every walk of life, not just drag Queens or men who wear dresses.

A higher percentage of a certain demographic abuse children, defending abusers by resorting to whataboutism in such a serious situation as child rape is reprehensible. You should be ashamed of yourself.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

A higher percentage of a certain demographic abuse children, defending abusers by resorting to whataboutism in such a serious situation as child rape is reprehensible. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Men?

 

[Oddball]

Men?

Leave trying to be clever for another time. Trolling in the Liverpool murders thread or when discussing child rape is a disgusting trait of members like you.

 

[LostLegend]

A higher percentage of a certain demographic abuse children, defending abusers by resorting to whataboutism in such a serious situation as child rape is reprehensible. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Of course you'll have evidence to back this clai...hahahahaha who am I kidding, of course you wont, you'll just go on another surrealist ramble again won't you? ???

 

[Oddball]

Sorry, I don't spend my weekends waiting on tenterhooks for your missives. The example you posted is, indeed unfortunate. However, using one person convicted of a crime 14 years ago as a reason to make insinuations about every drag performer's relationship with children is not logical. If we're going to go down that route there's not going to be any fathers allowed to see their children ever again.

It is logical when you understand that drag is about over-sexualisation, involving children in these exhibitionists fetishes is naive at best and not anything a responsible parent would allow.

 

[LostLegend]

It is logical when you understand that drag is about over-sexualisation, involving children in these exhibitionists fetishes is naive at best and not anything a responsible parent would allow.

There you have it, Oddballs has just cancelled Wishee Washee!

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Leave trying to be clever for another time. Trolling in the Liverpool murders thread or when discussing child rape is a disgusting trait of members like you.

Sorry bud

 

[Oddball]

I'm still waiting for you to explain how it is xxx rated......

You did post a video, (not of dqsh mind, of an independent organsier that failed to carry out checks properly). You realise that sex offenders (known or unknown) can apply for any jobs right? And its down to the employers to do the checks. But that sex offenders also come from every walk of life, not just drag Queens or men who wear dresses.

There you have it, Oddballs has just cancelled Wishee Washee!